Compumax H81H3-I

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics2.89% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (51%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemCompumax H81H3-I  (all builds)
MotherboardCompumax H81H3-I
Memory2.8 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150119
Uptime2.6 Days
Run DateJun 09 '21 at 19:28
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 51%

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-4130-$41
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
60.2% Good
Memory 80.7
1-Core 84.4
2-Core 157
64% 107 Pts
4-Core 232
8-Core 233
31% 232 Pts
64-Core 233
14% 233 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 60.2%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)
Elitegroup(1019 7ECF) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5171
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
2.89% Terrible
Lighting 3.2
Reflection 2.4
Parallax 4.5
3% 3.37 fps
MRender 5.3
Gravity 2.3
Splatting 4.8
3% 4.13 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.89%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB
369GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 101 104 102 98 103 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
61.8% Good
Read 114
Write 101
Mixed 111
SusWrite 99.9
80% 107 MB/s
4K Read 3.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
268% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 61.8%
Great: 79%
Generic External 1TB
276GB free, PID 0840
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 37 38 37 34 38 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
20.1% Poor
Read 39.9
Write 35.1
Mixed 27.6
SusWrite 36.6
46% 34.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.3
80% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 20.1%
Great: 29%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown VS2GB1333D4 6GB
1600, 1333 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
40.4% Average
MC Read 13.1
MC Write 14.7
MC Mixed 12.4
38% 13.4 GB/s
SC Read 11.5
SC Write 15.5
SC Mixed 13.2
38% 13.4 GB/s
Latency 79.3
50% 79.3 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 40.4%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback