Asus 970 PRO GAMING/AURA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 51%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics98% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive124% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus 970 PRO GAMING/AURA  (all builds)
Memory28.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170607
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 09 '21 at 16:31
Run Duration179 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 14%
Watch Gameplay: 5700-XT + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X4 840T
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
52.1% Above average
Memory 78.5
1-Core 53.4
2-Core 105
50% 79 Pts
4-Core 143
8-Core 194
21% 168 Pts
64-Core 190
12% 190 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 52.1%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 5700-XT-$199
MSI(1462 3810) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.30.02
Performing below potential (47th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
98% Outstanding
Lighting 125
Reflection 139
Parallax 246
102% 170 fps
MRender 116
Gravity 131
Splatting 91.7
90% 113 fps
Poor: 91%
This bench: 98%
Great: 104%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
XPG GAMMIX S11 Pro 1TB
772GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 42A4SANA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 265 297 495 574 580 564 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
124% Outstanding
Read 964
Write 167
Mixed 123
SusWrite 462
94% 429 MB/s
4K Read 41.7
4K Write 47
4K Mixed 43.7
144% 44.1 MB/s
DQ Read 412
DQ Write 126
DQ Mixed 206
168% 248 MB/s
Poor: 185%
This bench: 124%
Great: 373%
PNY CS900 500GB SSD
366GB free
Firmware: CS9006B3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 275 295 142 70 67 67 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
30.4% Below average
Read 174
Write 103
Mixed 88.6
SusWrite 153
29% 130 MB/s
4K Read 15.2
4K Write 16.9
4K Mixed 10.1
45% 14.1 MB/s
DQ Read 14.7
DQ Write 15
DQ Mixed 14.7
11% 14.8 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 30.4%
Great: 96%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
517GB free
Firmware: CC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 100 102 101 100 100 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
79.4% Very good
Read 177
Write 141
Mixed 85.9
SusWrite 99.8
92% 126 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
157% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 79.4%
Great: 112%
WD Blue 640GB (2008)-$33
421GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 97 92 97 98 97 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
56.4% Above average
Read 100
Write 98.6
Mixed 65.7
SusWrite 95.9
66% 90.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1
177% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 56.4%
Great: 62%
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25
400GB free
Firmware: MS1OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 124 128 130 130 129 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
70.9% Very good
Read 120
Write 116
Mixed 25.9
SusWrite 127
70% 97.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
146% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 70.9%
Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 1866 C9 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
30.5% Below average
MC Read 13.1
MC Write 6.4
MC Mixed 11.3
29% 10.3 GB/s
SC Read 7.5
SC Write 6.2
SC Mixed 9.9
22% 7.87 GB/s
Latency 83.3
48% 83.3 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 30.5%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 970 PRO GAMING/AURA Builds (Compare 902 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus 970 PRO GAMING/AURA - $299

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $588
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $290Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback