bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.09% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemVMware, VMware7,1
MotherboardIntel 440BX Desktop Reference Platform
Memory2.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1718 x 928 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200810
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 09 '21 at 02:05
Run Duration84 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10500
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
63.5% Good
Memory 81.5
1-Core 130
2-Core 266
87% 159 Pts
4-Core 268
8-Core 250
35% 259 Pts
64-Core 278
17% 278 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 63.5%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Vmware SVGA 3D
Vmware(15AD 0405)
Driver: vm3dum64_loader.dll Ver. 8.17.1.1
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
5.09% Terrible
Lighting 5.3
Reflection 8.7
Parallax 8.4
4% 7.47 fps
MRender 7.2
Gravity 4.6
Splatting 11.1
7% 7.63 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.09%
Great: 69%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Vmware Virtual NVMe Disk 64GB
41GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,582
Write 1,289
Mixed 1,404
318% 1,425 MB/s
4K Read 63
4K Write 49.9
4K Mixed 55.5
193% 56.1 MB/s
DQ Read 350
DQ Write 162
DQ Mixed 0.3
68% 171 MB/s
Poor: 33% Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
VMware Virtual RAM VMW-4096MB 1x4GB
1 of 128 slots used
4GB DIMM DRAM
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
40.4% Average
MC Read 16.1
MC Write 15
MC Mixed 11.5
41% 14.2 GB/s
SC Read 7.8
SC Write 10
SC Mixed 11
27% 9.6 GB/s
Latency 77.8
51% 77.8 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 40.4%
Great: 96%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,432 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback