IT NH5x_7xDPx

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics86.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemIT NH5x_7xDPx  (all builds)
MotherboardIT NH5x_7xDPx
Memory27.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210114
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 09 '21 at 00:53
Run Duration160 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10870H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
95.2% Outstanding
Memory 92.2
1-Core 141
2-Core 276
94% 170 Pts
4-Core 527
8-Core 948
89% 737 Pts
64-Core 1,402
87% 1,402 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 95.2%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060 (Laptop)
Clevo(1558 50F3) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 27.21.14.6663
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
86.9% Excellent
Lighting 106
Reflection 145
Parallax 97.6
87% 116 fps
MRender 141
Gravity 101
Splatting 87.9
87% 110 fps
Poor: 67%
This bench: 86.9%
Great: 105%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Metabox Performance 1TB PCIe NVME SSD
854GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFM53.0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1385
Write 1,870
Mixed 1,322
342% 1,526 MB/s
4K Read 47.6
4K Write 128
4K Mixed 64.5
222% 80 MB/s
DQ Read 686
DQ Write 841
DQ Mixed 871
627% 799 MB/s
Poor: 69% Great: 308%
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB (2013)
465GB free
Firmware: 04.01A04
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 109
Write 61.1
Mixed 59.2
57% 76.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
134% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 22% Great: 63%
Verbatim STORE N GO 32GB
18GB free, PID 0302
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 22.5
Write 14.4
Mixed 10.5
18% 15.8 MB/s
4K Read 6.7
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.8
72% 2.7 MB/s
Poor: 3% Great: 10%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-SD4-3200 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
87.6% Excellent
MC Read 33.9
MC Write 34.7
MC Mixed 23.8
88% 30.8 GB/s
SC Read 18.6
SC Write 40.5
SC Mixed 26.1
81% 28.4 GB/s
Latency 63.6
63% 63.6 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 87.6%
Great: 100%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical NH5x_7xDPx Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 76%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 71%
Battleship

System: IT NH5x_7xDPx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback