Lenovo 20N20035AD

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics4.88% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive109% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (39%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 40% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemLenovo 20N20035AD  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20N20035AD
Memory19.6 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210427
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 08 '21 at 17:48
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User KWT-User
Background CPU 39%
CPU Throttled 40%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8565U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 1.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
42.7% Average
Memory 56.3
1-Core 72.9
2-Core 133
50% 87.3 Pts
4-Core 158
8-Core 281
26% 219 Pts
64-Core 254
16% 254 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 42.7%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620
Legend(17AA 2279) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8935
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
4.88% Terrible
Lighting 5.5
Reflection 7.4
Parallax 7.2
4% 6.7 fps
MRender 9.4
Gravity 4.6
Splatting 6.9
6% 6.97 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.88%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SKHynix_HFS512GD9TNG-L5B0B 512GB
362GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 80750C10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 676 641 659 659 648 629 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 723
Write 984
Mixed 459
SusWrite 652
159% 704 MB/s
4K Read 19.7
4K Write 51.9
4K Mixed 13
74% 28.2 MB/s
DQ Read 340
DQ Write 485
DQ Mixed 450
330% 425 MB/s
Poor: 111%
This bench: 109%
Great: 225%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43BB1-CTD 859B CB16GS2666.C8ET 24GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 16384 MB
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
66.1% Good
MC Read 25.1
MC Write 29.7
MC Mixed 22.2
73% 25.7 GB/s
SC Read 9.3
SC Write 15.5
SC Mixed 13.8
37% 12.9 GB/s
Latency 139
29% 139 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 66.1%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20N20035AD Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20N20035AD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback