MSI MEG X399 CREATION (MS-7B92)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 96%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 126%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics149% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive174% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B92
MotherboardMSI MEG X399 CREATION (MS-7B92)  (all builds)
Memory49.6 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180809
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateJun 07 '21 at 19:14
Run Duration241 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 13%
Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen TR 2950X-$1,075
SP3r2, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
64.5% Good
Memory 48
1-Core 118
2-Core 230
69% 132 Pts
4-Core 432
8-Core 851
76% 641 Pts
64-Core 2,130
132% 2,130 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 64.5%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441
Asus(1043 8675) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 466.63
Performing below potential (24th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
149% Outstanding
Lighting 198
Reflection 193
Parallax 238
162% 210 fps
MRender 259
Gravity 200
Splatting 148
159% 202 fps
Poor: 128%
This bench: 149%
Great: 174%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 3D 2TB-$134
275GB free
Firmware: X61190WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 343 373 433 444 420 445 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
82.1% Excellent
Read 442
Write 416
Mixed 344
SusWrite 410
91% 403 MB/s
4K Read 26.1
4K Write 50
4K Mixed 31.7
107% 35.9 MB/s
DQ Read 227
DQ Write 50.4
DQ Mixed 31.7
51% 103 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 82.1%
Great: 118%
SanDisk Ultra 3D 2TB-$150
1TB free
Firmware: X61170RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 343 373 431 441 398 431 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
74.9% Very good
Read 320
Write 307
Mixed 223
SusWrite 403
71% 313 MB/s
4K Read 17.6
4K Write 46.4
4K Mixed 30.6
90% 31.5 MB/s
DQ Read 194
DQ Write 200
DQ Mixed 175
138% 190 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 74.9%
Great: 119%
WD Black NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB (2018)-$74
156GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 101140WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1145 1227 899 436 398 419 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
174% Outstanding
Read 1,754
Write 1,724
Mixed 1,666
SusWrite 754
331% 1,474 MB/s
4K Read 34.8
4K Write 69
4K Mixed 37.4
137% 47.1 MB/s
DQ Read 421
DQ Write 266
DQ Mixed 403
284% 363 MB/s
Poor: 182%
This bench: 174%
Great: 335%
WD easystore 25FB 10TB
918GB free, PID 25fb
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 146 149 148 149 149 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
69.7% Good
Read 141
Write 145
Mixed 109
SusWrite 148
185% 136 MB/s
4K Read 3
4K Write 5.3
4K Mixed 1.3
236% 3.2 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 69.7%
Great: 99%
Seagate FreeAgent 1.5TB
822GB free, PID 3008
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 36 37 37 36 36 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
17.2% Very poor
Read 31.5
Write 35
Mixed 24.7
SusWrite 36.2
44% 31.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 1
87% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 17.2%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F4-3200C16-16GTZR F4-3200C16-16GTZKW F4-3200C16-16GTZR F4-3200C16-16GTZKW 64GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
62% Good
MC Read 23.7
MC Write 20
MC Mixed 21.8
62% 21.8 GB/s
SC Read 20.7
SC Write 25.8
SC Mixed 22.8
66% 23.1 GB/s
Latency 168
24% 168 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 62%
Great: 93%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MEG X399 CREATION (MS-7B92) Builds (Compare 107 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 128%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 156%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MEG X399 CREATION (MS-7B92)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $1,619
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback