MSI B450 TOMAHAWK MAX (MS-7C02)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Boot Drive39.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C02
MotherboardMSI B450 TOMAHAWK MAX (MS-7C02)  (all builds)
Memory27.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.8 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210203
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 07 '21 at 16:50
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User UKR-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$78
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
99.3% Outstanding
Memory 89.2
1-Core 150
2-Core 300
98% 180 Pts
4-Core 588
8-Core 885
92% 737 Pts
64-Core 1,127
70% 1,127 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 99.3%
Great: 92%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$28
39GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1D1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 41 37 136 27 51 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
39.9% Below average
Read 305
Write 98.9
Mixed 121
SusWrite 70.4
33% 149 MB/s
4K Read 20.1
4K Write 36.9
4K Mixed 17
72% 24.7 MB/s
DQ Read 36.3
DQ Write 38.4
DQ Mixed 34.3
27% 36.3 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 39.9%
Great: 85%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$69
123GB free
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,737
Write 2,524
Mixed 1,996
538% 2,419 MB/s
4K Read 76.2
4K Write 212
4K Mixed 107
365% 132 MB/s
DQ Read 1,490
DQ Write 1,366
DQ Mixed 1,400
1,058% 1,419 MB/s
Poor: 178% Great: 346%
Kingston SA400S371920G 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: S3401103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 445 456 457 457 457 457 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
98.7% Outstanding
Read 508
Write 454
Mixed 413
SusWrite 455
103% 457 MB/s
4K Read 26.3
4K Write 98.6
4K Mixed 29.1
129% 51.3 MB/s
DQ Read 179
DQ Write 349
DQ Mixed 91
118% 207 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 98.7%
Great: 102%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BLS16G4D30AESB.M16FE BLS16G4D32AESB.M16FE 32GB
3800, 3800 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
112% Outstanding
MC Read 46.6
MC Write 28.7
MC Mixed 46.3
116% 40.5 GB/s
SC Read 30.4
SC Write 28.7
SC Mixed 45.3
99% 34.8 GB/s
Latency 68.3
59% 68.3 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 112%
Great: 113%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B450 TOMAHAWK MAX (MS-7C02) Builds (Compare 19,411 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 98%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 92%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: MSI B450 TOMAHAWK MAX (MS-7C02) - $90

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 112% - Outstanding Total price: $497
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback