HP 100-5160l

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 30%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics0.67% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive43.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP 100-5160l  (all builds)
MotherboardPEGATRON 2AAE
Memory1.7 GB free of 3 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100820
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 07 '21 at 09:43
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User THA-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X2 270u
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
42.8% Average
Memory 76.5
1-Core 29
2-Core 56.6
38% 54 Pts
4-Core 56.7
8-Core 55.4
8% 56.1 Pts
64-Core 54.6
3% 54.6 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 42.8%
Great: 44%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4250
HP(103C 2AAE) 256MB
Driver: aticfx32.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
0.67% Terrible
Lighting 0.7
Reflection 0.7
Parallax 0.8
1% 0.73 fps
MRender 0.9
Gravity 0.9
Splatting 1.3
1% 1.03 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.67%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Galax TA1D0120A 120GB
89GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 183 107 53 53 61 62 MB/s
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
43.6% Average
Read 233
Write 182
Mixed 189
SusWrite 86.5
39% 173 MB/s
4K Read 16.9
4K Write 47.8
4K Mixed 19.1
75% 27.9 MB/s
DQ Read 133
DQ Write 135
DQ Mixed 124
96% 131 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 43.6%
Great: 80%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3GB
null MHz
1024, 2048 MB
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
22.6% Poor
MC Read 8.9
MC Write 5.8
MC Mixed 6.9
21% 7.2 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 5.3
SC Mixed 6.4
18% 6.2 GB/s
Latency 87.4
46% 87.4 ns
Poor: 8%
This bench: 22.6%
Great: 23%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback