HP Pavilion Desktop 590-p0xxx

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics43.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP Pavilion Desktop 590-p0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8433
Memory9.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200207
Uptime1.3 Days
Run DateJun 04 '21 at 21:29
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G-$135
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
64.4% Good
Memory 70.7
1-Core 110
2-Core 196
71% 126 Pts
4-Core 313
8-Core 589
54% 451 Pts
64-Core 587
36% 587 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 64.4%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 466.11
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
43.6% Average
Lighting 56.9
Reflection 55.7
Parallax 49.9
46% 54.2 fps
MRender 42.8
Gravity 51.1
Splatting 46.2
38% 46.7 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 43.6%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SK hynix BC501 HFM128GDJTNG-8310A 128GB
20GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 80002C00
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 693
Write 398
Mixed 570
123% 554 MB/s
4K Read 36.5
4K Write 87.5
4K Mixed 48.6
164% 57.5 MB/s
DQ Read 287
DQ Write 342
DQ Mixed 267
215% 299 MB/s
Poor: 63% Great: 139%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
266GB free
Firmware: 03.01A03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 133 133 134 133 133 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
87.6% Excellent
Read 172
Write 156
Mixed 107
SusWrite 133
105% 142 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 1.2
235% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 87.6%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT8G4DFS8266.C8FN Hynix HMA81GU6JJR8N-VK 16GB
2666, 2666 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
85.4% Excellent
MC Read 31
MC Write 33.7
MC Mixed 28.2
88% 31 GB/s
SC Read 21.2
SC Write 34.8
SC Mixed 23.5
76% 26.5 GB/s
Latency 99.8
40% 99.8 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 85.4%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pavilion Desktop 590-p0xxx Builds (Compare 1,932 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: HP Pavilion Desktop 590-p0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 105% - Outstanding Total price: $114
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback