| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
| Graphics | 0.38% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
| System | NVIDIA AWRDACPI |
| Motherboard | Nvidia AWRDACPI (all builds) |
| Memory | 1.7 GB free of 3 GB @ 0 GHz |
| Display | 1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20040827 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Jul 20 '17 at 09:09 |
| Run Duration | 161 Seconds |
| Run User | THA-User |
| Background CPU | 0% |
PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
AMD Athlon 64 2800+
Socket 754, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz
|
35.3%
Below average
|
31% 39.1 Pts
|
4% 25.8 Pts
|
2% 26 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GeForce 6600 GT
Device(0000 0000) 128MB
Ram: 128MB, Driver: 309.8
|
0.38%
Terrible
|
1% 0.52 fps
| ||
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
63.5%
Good
|
74% 99.6 MB/s
|
148% 1.52 MB/s
| |
|
|
37.6%
Below average
|
38% 51.7 MB/s
|
84% 0.71 MB/s
| |
|
|
47%
Average
|
50% 67.4 MB/s
|
131% 1.2 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 3x1GB
3 of 3 slots used
3GB DIMM
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
9.2%
Terrible
|
7% 2.3 GB/s
|
8% 2.67 GB/s
|
37% 109 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical AWRDACPI Builds (Compare 2 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Nvidia AWRDACPI
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 54% - Above average | Total price: $50 |