Asus B75M-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics25.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive37.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus B75M-A  (all builds)
Memory12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140731
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 04 '21 at 15:26
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3470-$59
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
76.8% Very good
Memory 89.4
1-Core 98.3
2-Core 189
74% 126 Pts
4-Core 373
8-Core 370
50% 371 Pts
64-Core 365
23% 365 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 76.8%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 670-$435
Asus(1043 83F8) 2GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 466.63
Performing below potential (29th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
25.8% Poor
Lighting 28.8
Reflection 34.1
Parallax 46
24% 36.3 fps
MRender 44.1
Gravity 36.4
Splatting 32.4
30% 37.6 fps
Poor: 25%
This bench: 25.8%
Great: 31%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 256GB 256GB
175GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FW201219
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 9.5 11 45 9.6 56 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
37.7% Below average
Read 452
Write 13.5
Mixed 24.1
SusWrite 34.4
28% 131 MB/s
4K Read 24.5
4K Write 9.9
4K Mixed 6.6
51% 13.7 MB/s
DQ Read 125
DQ Write 15.5
DQ Mixed 8.6
22% 49.7 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 37.7%
Great: 166%
Hitachi HTS541010B7E610 1TB
911GB free
Firmware: 03.01A03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 117 117 116 118 120 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 22% Great: 72%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TD8G16C11-H11 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
59.5% Above average
MC Read 21.9
MC Write 22.1
MC Mixed 18.2
59% 20.7 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 17.7
50% 17.5 GB/s
Latency 68
59% 68 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 59.5%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B75M-A Builds (Compare 624 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus B75M-A - $110

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $435
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback