Positivo C14CU51

Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 39% Jet ski	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	1.26% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	71.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Positivo C14CU51 (all builds)
Motherboard	Positivo C14CU51
Memory	5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130802
Uptime	4.6 Days
Run Date	Jun 04 '21 at 12:25
Run Duration	136 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	8%

PC Performing as expected (48^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron 1007U 5,995 User benchmarks, average bench 39% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 1.5 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	38% Below average	Memory 62.3 1-Core 40.9 2-Core 83.1 40% 62.1 Pts	4-Core 82.6 8-Core 81.2 11% 81.9 Pts	64-Core 83.4 5% 83.4 Pts
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 38% Great: 47%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (G3 Pentium/Celeron 1.0/1.1 GHz) 28,701 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Device(1297 2032) 2.5GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.5161 Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	1.26% Terrible	Lighting 1.4 Reflection 0.5 Parallax 1.4 1% 1.1 fps	MRender 2.6 Gravity 1 Splatting 1.9 2% 1.83 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.26% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 163GB free (System drive) Firmware: S3700100 SusWrite @10s intervals: 336 356 407 298 257 246 MB/s Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	71.2% Very good	Read 449 Write 367 Mixed 386 SusWrite 317 85% 380 MB/s	4K Read 22.5 4K Write 43.4 4K Mixed 22.9 86% 29.6 MB/s	DQ Read 184 DQ Write 150 DQ Mixed 135 110% 156 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 71.2% Great: 100%
Seagate ST320LM001 HN-M320MBB 320GB 6,367 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 196GB free Firmware: 2AR20002 SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 69 71 71 71 71 MB/s Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	42.5% Average	Read 77.8 Write 52.2 Mixed 44 SusWrite 70.1 45% 61 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.6 124% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 42.5% Great: 51%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 1x8GB 3,554 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing below potential (31^st percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	27.1% Poor	MC Read 9.5 MC Write 9.4 MC Mixed 8.4 26% 9.1 GB/s	SC Read 9.1 SC Write 8.3 SC Mixed 8.8 25% 8.73 GB/s	Latency 121 33% 121 ns
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 27.1% Great: 48%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical C14CU51 Builds (Compare 53 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 40%

Jet ski

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

System: Positivo C14CU51

CPU
Celeron 1007UIntelBench 39%, 5,995 samples	35x
Celeron 847Intel $259Bench 34%, 3,990 samples	17x
Core i3-3217UIntelBench 43%, 28,188 samples	1x

GPU
HD Graphics (G3 Pentium/Celeron 1.0/1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 28,701 samples	35x
HD Graphics (G2 Pentium/Celeron 1.1/1.15 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 45,735 samples	17x
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	1x

SSD
A400 120GBKingston $28Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	5x
Burst 120GBPatriotBench 66%, 15,567 samples	2x
128GB 128GBSSDBench 65%, 7,332 samples	2x

RAM
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	4x
1x8GBKingstonBench 32%, 3,554 samples	3x
TMT325S6EFR8A-PBHJ 1x2GBTeikonBench 20%, 269 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 12% - Very poor

Total price: $28

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16