Lenovo 4352A8G

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics12.7% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive101% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemLenovo 4352A8G  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LENOVO
Memory10 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131001
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 03 '21 at 09:28
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-1650 v2-$635
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
79.4% Very good
Memory 85.6
1-Core 97
2-Core 195
73% 126 Pts
4-Core 394
8-Core 635
63% 515 Pts
64-Core 750
46% 750 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 79.4%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K4000
Nvidia(10DE 097C) 3GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 1404 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 452.57
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
12.7% Very poor
Lighting 14.3
Reflection 18.7
Parallax 19.5
12% 17.5 fps
MRender 22
Gravity 18.4
Splatting 15.3
15% 18.6 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 12.7%
Great: 13%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 500GB-$50
400GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 406 404 407 406 421 352 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 444
Write 424
Mixed 387
SusWrite 399
93% 414 MB/s
4K Read 31
4K Write 59.7
4K Mixed 42.9
134% 44.5 MB/s
DQ Read 390
DQ Write 346
DQ Mixed 294
241% 343 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 101%
Great: 125%
WD Elements 10B8 500GB
465GB free, PID 10b8
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 110
Write 111
Mixed 61.6
117% 94.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
107% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 13% Great: 39%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9965525-055.A 2x8GB
2 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
55.6% Above average
MC Read 20.7
MC Write 19.2
MC Mixed 19.7
57% 19.9 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 13.7
SC Mixed 12
40% 13.9 GB/s
Latency 71.5
56% 71.5 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 55.6%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 4352A8G Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 117%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 102%
UFO

System: Lenovo 4352A8G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $1,094
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback