Medion MS-7848

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics19.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive70% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMedion MS-7848  (all builds)
MotherboardMEDION MS-7848
Memory2.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140319
Uptime4.6 Days
Run DateJun 03 '21 at 08:46
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4440-$128
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
75.3% Very good
Memory 89.8
1-Core 94.9
2-Core 187
73% 124 Pts
4-Core 352
8-Core 356
47% 354 Pts
64-Core 359
22% 359 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 75.3%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 760 (192-bit)
MSI(1462 284B) 1.5GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 1.5GB, Driver: 390.77
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
19.9% Very poor
Lighting 22.3
Reflection 25
Parallax 30.9
18% 26.1 fps
MRender 33.4
Gravity 28.3
Splatting 24.8
23% 28.8 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 19.9%
Great: 22%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron_M510_MTFDDAK128MAZ 128GB
27GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 91 92 95 93 90 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
70% Very good
Read 413
Write 182
Mixed 210
SusWrite 98.9
50% 226 MB/s
4K Read 23.7
4K Write 89.4
4K Mixed 31.5
124% 48.2 MB/s
DQ Read 310
DQ Write 126
DQ Mixed 157
132% 198 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 70%
Great: 86%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28
118GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 107 92 109 108 109 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
61.2% Good
Read 108
Write 83.9
Mixed 25.3
SusWrite 105
58% 80.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
129% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 61.2%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Nanya M2F4G64CB88C7N-DI 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
56% Above average
MC Read 20.7
MC Write 20.5
MC Mixed 17.7
56% 19.6 GB/s
SC Read 14.5
SC Write 17.6
SC Mixed 14.1
44% 15.4 GB/s
Latency 67.5
59% 67.5 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 56%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-7848 Builds (Compare 690 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

System: Medion MS-7848

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 51% - Above average Total price: $251
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback