Acer Aspire C22-865

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics6.14% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 88% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemAcer Aspire C22-865  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire C22-865(KUR)
Memory3.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190704
Uptime3.2 Days
Run DateJun 02 '21 at 21:17
Run Duration105 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU1%
CPU Throttled 88%

 PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8250U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
83.2% Excellent
Memory 89.9
1-Core 109
2-Core 217
79% 139 Pts
4-Core 424
8-Core 534
62% 479 Pts
64-Core 356
22% 356 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 83.2%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake R)
Acer(1025 1287) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 23.20.16.4849
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
6.14% Terrible
Lighting 6.9
Reflection 6.3
Parallax 7.6
6% 6.93 fps
MRender 8.4
Gravity 6.4
Splatting 10.6
7% 8.47 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.14%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB
795GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 86 91 88 83 91 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
54.9% Above average
Read 104
Write 56.4
Mixed 54.9
SusWrite 86.3
55% 75.4 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 4.1
4K Mixed 0.6
184% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 54.9%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata AO1P24HC4N2-BYNS 8GB
2400, 2400 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
64.9% Good
MC Read 25.7
MC Write 21.9
MC Mixed 19.4
64% 22.3 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 27
SC Mixed 22.4
61% 21.2 GB/s
Latency 67.3
59% 67.3 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 64.9%
Great: 64%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire C22-865 Builds (Compare 48 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire C22-865

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback