HP ZBook 17

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive92.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP ZBook 17  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 190A
Memory17.8 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200303
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 02 '21 at 19:48
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4700MQ-$209
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
67.1% Good
Memory 80.7
1-Core 94.5
2-Core 169
68% 115 Pts
4-Core 290
8-Core 413
44% 352 Pts
64-Core 433
27% 433 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 67.1%
Great: 71%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX100 512GB-$200
378GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 431 413 384 404 412 425 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
92.8% Outstanding
Read 402
Write 434
Mixed 301
SusWrite 412
87% 387 MB/s
4K Read 26.5
4K Write 82.9
4K Mixed 36.9
131% 48.8 MB/s
DQ Read 155
DQ Write 339
DQ Mixed 180
156% 225 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 92.8%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B1G73EB0-YK0 Hynix HMT451S6BFR8A-PB M471B1G73QH0-YK0 Hynix HMT451S6BFR8A-PB 24GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096, 8192, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
54.1% Above average
MC Read 19.9
MC Write 20.5
MC Mixed 15.7
54% 18.7 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 18.2
SC Mixed 19.2
49% 17.1 GB/s
Latency 79.3
50% 79.3 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 54.1%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ZBook 17 Builds (Compare 209 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: HP ZBook 17

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $305
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback