Besstar DMAF5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics10.8% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive176% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemBesstar DMAF5  (all builds)
MotherboardBESSTAR DMAF5
Memory24.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201021
Uptime3 Days
Run DateJun 02 '21 at 16:49
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
65.5% Good
Memory 63.1
1-Core 110
2-Core 219
71% 131 Pts
4-Core 365
8-Core 529
56% 447 Pts
64-Core 501
31% 501 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 65.5%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 8 Graphics
AMD(1002 0123) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 21.5.1
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
10.8% Very poor
Lighting 13.4
Reflection 13.1
Parallax 18.7
11% 15.1 fps
MRender 11.7
Gravity 15.2
Splatting 11.7
10% 12.9 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 10.8%
Great: 13%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
minisforum 512GB
212GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EDFM60.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1510 1587 322 324 325 315 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
176% Outstanding
Read 1,113
Write 1,644
Mixed 1,050
SusWrite 731
256% 1,135 MB/s
4K Read 39.8
4K Write 103
4K Mixed 60.8
193% 67.9 MB/s
DQ Read 741
DQ Write 450
DQ Mixed 641
465% 611 MB/s
Poor: 141%
This bench: 176%
Great: 212%
Seagate Momentus 5400.6 2.5" 500GB-$26
291GB free
Firmware: 0005HPM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 69 70 72 71 70 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
40% Below average
Read 68.8
Write 68
Mixed 38.8
SusWrite 70.4
45% 61.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.6
108% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 40%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston CBD24D4S7D8K1A-16 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
80.9% Excellent
MC Read 29.8
MC Write 30.3
MC Mixed 27.5
83% 29.2 GB/s
SC Read 21.6
SC Write 33.7
SC Mixed 24
76% 26.4 GB/s
Latency 119
34% 119 ns
Poor: 74%
This bench: 80.9%
Great: 81%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical DMAF5 Builds (Compare 21 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Besstar DMAF5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback