ADD TO PC
BUILD

Gatewa GT5405H

Performance Results


Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 9% Tree trunk	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 14.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	0.7% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	48.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

System	Gatewa GT5405H (all builds)
Motherboard	Intel D945GCL
Memory	0.9 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors, ,
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20061213
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 01 '21 at 22:17
Run Duration	149 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium D 2.80GHz 3,782 User benchmarks, average bench 29% LGA 775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	14.9% Very poor	Memory 25.2 1-Core 17.3 2-Core 31.5 16% 24.7 Pts	4-Core 28.2 8-Core 29.2 4% 28.7 Pts	64-Core 28.1 2% 28.1 Pts
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 14.9% Great: 36%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon X1800 Series 22 User benchmarks, average bench 1% AMD(1002 0B12) 512MB Driver: atiumdag Ver. 8.56.1.16 Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	0.7% Terrible	Lighting 1.3 Reflection 3.8 Parallax 1.6 1% 2.23 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.7% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
OCZ VERTEX3 60GB 3,574 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 44GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2.11 SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 72 74 74 74 74 MB/s Performing below potential (9^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	48.6% Average	Read 219 Write 78.7 Mixed 119 SusWrite 72.5 27% 122 MB/s	4K Read 26.5 4K Write 52.9 4K Mixed 29.9 106% 36.4 MB/s	DQ Read 32.2 DQ Write 76.3 DQ Mixed 37.2 33% 48.6 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 48.6% Great: 70%
WD WD2000JB-00GVA0 200GB 597 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 171GB free Firmware: 08.02D08 SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 58 58 57 57 57 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	31.8% Below average	Read 53.7 Write 59.4 Mixed 32.3 SusWrite 56.9 37% 50.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.9 153% 1 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 31.8% Great: 32%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1x2GB 99,586 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 1 of 4 slots used 2GB DIMM DDR2 Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	11.2% Very poor	MC Read 4.1 MC Write 3.8 MC Mixed 3.6 11% 3.83 GB/s	SC Read 4.3 SC Write 1.9 SC Mixed 3.2 9% 3.13 GB/s	Latency 284 14% 284 ns
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 11.2% Great: 26%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback