Gigabyte GA-F2A68HM-S1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 28.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics4.54% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive29.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (70%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-F2A68HM-S1  (all builds)
Memory1.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151224
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 01 '21 at 19:11
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 70%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A6-7400K APU (2014 D.Ka)
P0, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
28.6% Poor
Memory 43.6
1-Core 53
2-Core 72.8
35% 56.5 Pts
4-Core 81.8
8-Core 69.1
10% 75.4 Pts
64-Core 88.7
6% 88.7 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 28.6%
Great: 45%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R5 Graphics
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 21.2.3
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
4.54% Terrible
Lighting 5.2
Reflection 5.3
Parallax 6.7
4% 5.73 fps
MRender 4.8
Gravity 5.2
Splatting 8
5% 6 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.54%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
76GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1Z40102
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 203 123 74 50 3.5 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
29.1% Poor
Read 290
Write 296
Mixed 268
SusWrite 97.1
53% 238 MB/s
4K Read 27
4K Write 5
4K Mixed 0.3
44% 10.8 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 29.1%
Great: 100%
SanDisk Ultra 16GB
11GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 16 17 18 18 19 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
15% Very poor
Read 30.9
Write 15.4
Mixed 14.3
SusWrite 17.5
24% 19.5 MB/s
4K Read 3.8
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 2
147% 2.57 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 15%
Great: 36%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5173EB0- M378B5173DB0- 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
24.4% Poor
MC Read 10.2
MC Write 7.1
MC Mixed 9.3
25% 8.87 GB/s
SC Read 5.8
SC Write 5.2
SC Mixed 6.7
17% 5.9 GB/s
Latency 186
22% 186 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 24.4%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-F2A68HM-S1 Builds (Compare 513 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-F2A68HM-S1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 12% - Very poor Total price: $26
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback