Intel NUC6CAYB

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 35%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.11% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive45.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemIntel NUC6CAYH
MotherboardIntel NUC6CAYB  (all builds)
Memory5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171123
Uptime1.3 Days
Run DateMay 31 '21 at 07:23
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron J3455
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
37.5% Below average
Memory 45.7
1-Core 43.4
2-Core 88.6
35% 59.2 Pts
4-Core 170
8-Core 172
23% 171 Pts
64-Core 171
11% 171 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 37.5%
Great: 38%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 500
Intel(8086 2067) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8681
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
2.11% Terrible
Lighting 2.2
Reflection 2.6
Parallax 2.5
2% 2.43 fps
MRender 3.6
Gravity 2.3
Splatting 3.9
3% 3.27 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.11%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Midasforce 512GB 512GB
291GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T0910A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 314 276 315 300 252 61 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
45.3% Average
Read 312
Write 289
Mixed 60.4
SusWrite 253
51% 229 MB/s
4K Read 5.8
4K Write 51.7
4K Mixed 0.6
37% 19.4 MB/s
DQ Read 131
DQ Write 202
DQ Mixed 0.6
47% 111 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 45.3%
Great: 239%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung V-GeN D3V4GS16B8R Unde 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
31% Below average
MC Read 11.9
MC Write 13.7
MC Mixed 10.9
35% 12.2 GB/s
SC Read 3.3
SC Write 4.6
SC Mixed 4.3
12% 4.07 GB/s
Latency 178
22% 178 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical NUC6CAYB Builds (Compare 127 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 30%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Intel NUC6CAYB

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 11% - Very poor Total price: $29
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback