Toshiba Satellite C665

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 19%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (87th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 13 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics0.7% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemToshiba Satellite C665  (all builds)
MotherboardTOSHIBA Portable PC
Memory0.9 GB free of 2 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110628
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 30 '21 at 18:01
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium P6100
, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2 GHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
40.4% Average
Memory 64.5
1-Core 50.3
2-Core 99.4
44% 71.4 Pts
4-Core 97.3
8-Core 98.6
13% 97.9 Pts
64-Core 98.8
6% 98.8 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 40.4%
Great: 41%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)
Toshiba(1179 FDE2) 731MB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2993
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
0.7% Terrible
Lighting 0.8
Reflection 1.2
Parallax 0.8
1% 0.93 fps
MRender 1.2
Gravity 0.7
Splatting 1
1% 0.97 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.7%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba MK3275GSX 320GB
106GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GT001M
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 70 61 73 71 74 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
41.5% Average
Read 74.7
Write 74.5
Mixed 19.5
SusWrite 69.9
43% 59.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
111% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 41.5%
Great: 46%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TSB1066D3S7ELF/2G 1x2GB
1 of 2 slots used
2GB SODIMM DDR3 1067 MHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
21.3% Poor
MC Read 7
MC Write 7
MC Mixed 7
20% 7 GB/s
SC Read 6.8
SC Write 5.3
SC Mixed 6.3
18% 6.13 GB/s
Latency 115
35% 115 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 21.3%
Great: 21%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Satellite C665 Builds (Compare 14 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 22%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk

System: Toshiba Satellite C665

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 50% - Above average Total price: $177
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback