Asus ROG CROSSHAIR VIII HERO (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 107%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics3.89% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive439% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG CROSSHAIR VIII HERO (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory60.3 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210319
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 30 '21 at 15:41
Run Duration268 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X-$363
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.65 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Memory 93.5
1-Core 169
2-Core 337
108% 200 Pts
4-Core 645
8-Core 1,082
105% 864 Pts
64-Core 1,576
98% 1,576 Pts
Poor: 90%
This bench: 107%
Great: 110%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
Asus(1043 86CB) 2GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
3.89% Terrible
Lighting 4.6
Reflection 6.3
Parallax 5
4% 5.3 fps
MRender 6.4
Gravity 4
Splatting 5
4% 5.13 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.89%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate FireCuda 520 SSD ZP2000GM30002 2TB
2TB free (System drive)
Firmware: STNSC014
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3888 3979 3985 3987 1372 872 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
439% Outstanding
Read 2,344
Write 3,690
Mixed 2,160
SusWrite 3,014
636% 2,802 MB/s
4K Read 56.6
4K Write 235
4K Mixed 88.9
324% 127 MB/s
DQ Read 1,526
DQ Write 1,260
DQ Mixed 1,402
1,047% 1,396 MB/s
Poor: 173%
This bench: 439%
Great: 502%
Seagate FireCuda 520 SSD ZP2000GM30002 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: STNSC014
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3840 2852 924 883 866 849 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
349% Outstanding
Read 1,998
Write 2,074
Mixed 2,220
SusWrite 1,702
451% 1,999 MB/s
4K Read 57.5
4K Write 226
4K Mixed 87.8
319% 124 MB/s
DQ Read 1,573
DQ Write 1436
DQ Mixed 1,538
1,145% 1,516 MB/s
Poor: 173%
This bench: 349%
Great: 502%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
465GB free
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 453 453 453 453 450 361 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 501
Write 452
Mixed 419
SusWrite 437
102% 452 MB/s
4K Read 34.3
4K Write 98.5
4K Mixed 52.5
171% 61.8 MB/s
DQ Read 219
DQ Write 185
DQ Mixed 200
150% 201 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 109%
Great: 129%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMH32GX4M2Z3200C16 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
103% Outstanding
MC Read 43.1
MC Write 27.1
MC Mixed 39.8
105% 36.7 GB/s
SC Read 31.1
SC Write 26.5
SC Mixed 41.9
95% 33.2 GB/s
Latency 61
66% 61 ns
Poor: 74%
This bench: 103%
Great: 138%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG CROSSHAIR VIII HERO (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 2,986 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 184%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 201%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG CROSSHAIR VIII HERO (WI-FI) - $400

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $1,465
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback