Asus TUF Gaming FX505DY_FX505DY

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics21.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive259% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAsus TUF Gaming FX505DY_FX505DY  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX505DY
Memory11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
DisplayΧρώματα 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200309
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 30 '21 at 13:37
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
74% Very good
Memory 67.6
1-Core 113
2-Core 224
74% 135 Pts
4-Core 433
8-Core 615
66% 524 Pts
64-Core 586
36% 586 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 74%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon RX 560X
Asus(1043 17C1) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 256MB, Driver: 21.4.1
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
21.4% Poor
Lighting 25.7
Reflection 29.1
Parallax 34.7
21% 29.8 fps
MRender 28.5
Gravity 28.2
Splatting 25.3
22% 27.3 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 21.4%
Great: 24%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
280GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1065 869 863 842 841 833 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
259% Outstanding
Read 2,487
Write 1961
Mixed 1,656
SusWrite 886
390% 1,747 MB/s
4K Read 60.6
4K Write 97.2
4K Mixed 72.6
236% 76.8 MB/s
DQ Read 904
DQ Write 523
DQ Mixed 756
551% 728 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 259%
Great: 355%
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB-$21
458GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 104 104 105 106 106 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
59.6% Above average
Read 103
Write 103
Mixed 56.6
SusWrite 105
67% 91.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
136% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 59.6%
Great: 61%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 4GB
0GB free, PID 1607
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.5 2.9 2.7 3 3.3 3.2 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
2.57% Terrible
Read 7.2
Write 3.2
Mixed 2.7
SusWrite 2.9
5% 4 MB/s
4K Read 3.8
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
14% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.57%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-2G6E1 Kingston 16GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
81.2% Excellent
MC Read 29.9
MC Write 30.9
MC Mixed 27.2
84% 29.3 GB/s
SC Read 21.6
SC Write 32.7
SC Mixed 23.2
74% 25.8 GB/s
Latency 107
37% 107 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 81.2%
Great: 81%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Gaming FX505DY_FX505DY Builds (Compare 582 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Asus TUF Gaming FX505DY_FX505DY

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback