Asrock A320M-HDV R3.0

Performance Results


Gaming 35% Jet ski	Desktop 79% Battleship	Workstation 32% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	42.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	79.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asrock A320M-HDV R3.0 (all builds)
Memory	2.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190814
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 29 '21 at 21:36
Run Duration	134 Seconds
Run User	ESP-User
Background CPU	1%

Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 1600-$110 392,253 User benchmarks, average bench 70% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	76.3% Very good	Memory 74.9 1-Core 112 2-Core 221 76% 136 Pts	4-Core 418 8-Core 610 64% 514 Pts	64-Core 819 51% 819 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 76.3% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155 259,091 User benchmarks, average bench 43% Zotac(19DA 1546) CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71 Performing below potential (66^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	42.9% Average	Lighting 55.5 Reflection 56.7 Parallax 49.3 45% 53.8 fps	MRender 42.6 Gravity 51.1 Splatting 46.4 38% 46.7 fps
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 42.9% Great: 46%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Adata Premier SP550 240GB-$74 29,295 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 172GB free (System drive) Firmware: P0121AA SusWrite @10s intervals: 243 54 55 55 54 54 MB/s Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	79.8% Very good	Read 495 Write 439 Mixed 383 SusWrite 85.8 78% 351 MB/s	4K Read 29.1 4K Write 70.3 4K Mixed 39 131% 46.1 MB/s	DQ Read 285 DQ Write 340 DQ Mixed 238 200% 288 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 79.8% Great: 92%
Kingston SSDNow UV400 240GB-$89 105,079 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 155GB free Firmware: 0C3FD6SD SusWrite @10s intervals: 364 143 93 93 87 85 MB/s Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	80% Excellent	Read 480 Write 455 Mixed 352 SusWrite 144 80% 358 MB/s	4K Read 28.4 4K Write 68.3 4K Mixed 35.9 125% 44.2 MB/s	DQ Read 317 DQ Write 280 DQ Mixed 184 170% 260 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 80% Great: 88%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLS4G4D240FSC.8FBD2 2x4GB 1,235 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	46.1% Average	MC Read 17.2 MC Write 15.4 MC Mixed 14.4 45% 15.7 GB/s	SC Read 16 SC Write 15 SC Mixed 16 45% 15.7 GB/s	Latency 90.7 44% 90.7 ns
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 46.1% Great: 92%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical A320M-HDV R3.0 Builds (Compare 330 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 26%

Raft

Desktop 71%

Battleship

Workstation 22%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock A320M-HDV R3.0

CPU
Ryzen 3 2200GAMD $104Bench 60%, 181,631 samples	79x
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $150Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	57x
Ryzen 3 1200AMD $100Bench 57%, 83,528 samples	24x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	38x
RX Vega 8 (Ryzen iGPU)AMDBench 10%, 85,536 samples	25x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	21x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	15x
A400 120GBKingston $28Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	9x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	8x

RAM
KF3200C16D4/8GX 2x8GBKingstonBench 88%, 58,684 samples	9x
Aegis DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 82%, 163,634 samples	8x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	7x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 83% - Excellent

Total price: $191

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16