Asus K50IN

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.66% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemAsus K50IN  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK K50IN
Memory1.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 2 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20090722
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 28 '21 at 21:40
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium T4300
Socket 478, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
37.2% Below average
Memory 64.8
1-Core 29.2
2-Core 58.4
35% 50.8 Pts
4-Core 58.6
8-Core 57.6
8% 58.1 Pts
64-Core 58.6
4% 58.6 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 37.2%
Great: 41%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce G102M
Asus(1043 19B4) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 327.02
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
0.66% Terrible
Lighting 0.7
Reflection 0.2
Parallax 0.1
1% 0.33 fps
MRender 1.1
Gravity 0.7
Splatting 1.2
1% 1 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.66%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS543232L9A300 320GB-$49
31GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FB4OC40C
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 594
Write 23.3
Mixed 48.8
160% 222 MB/s
4K Read 178
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 1.5
7,570% 59.8 MB/s
Poor: 9% Great: 34%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM SDRAM
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
12.9% Very poor
MC Read 4.3
MC Write 3.9
MC Mixed 3.1
11% 3.77 GB/s
SC Read 3.5
SC Write 3.7
SC Mixed 4
11% 3.73 GB/s
Latency 114
35% 114 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 12.9%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical K50IN Builds (Compare 36 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Asus K50IN

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback