Asrock 960GC-GS FX

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 41% Speed boat	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	3.71% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Motherboard	Asrock 960GC-GS FX (all builds)
Memory	2.4 GB free of 4 GB
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colori,
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20131002
Uptime	1 Days
Run Date	Jul 18 '17 at 13:45
Run Duration	475 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing as expected (55^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon II X2 240 5,506 User benchmarks, average bench 40% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3.05 GHz Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	43.2% Average	Memory 71.7 1-Core 44.7 2-Core 87.5 44% 68 Pts	4-Core 88.5 8-Core 90.3 12% 89.4 Pts	64-Core 87.6 5% 87.6 Pts
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 43.2% Great: 47%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710 187,161 User benchmarks, average bench 3% MSI(1462 8C93) 1GB CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 382.5 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	3.71% Terrible	Lighting 4.37 Reflection 4.31 Parallax 4.16 4% 4.28 fps	MRender 4.1 Gravity 3.9 Splatting 6.17 4% 4.72 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.71% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
WD Blue 320GB (2008)-$39 64,707 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 37GB free Firmware: 02.03E02 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (51^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 185 184 1102473 (03) Spinup time 128 125 4558 (04) Start/Stop count 95 95 5797 (05) Reallocated sector count 199 199 2 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 40 40 43997 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 95 95 5384 (C0) Power-off retract count 195 195 4407 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 199 199 5797 (C2) HDA temperature 105 72 38 (C4) Reallocation count 199 199 1 (C5) Current pending sector count 198 197 124 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 198 195 124 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 33 (C8) Write error rate 200 199 109 (F0) Head flying hours 43 43 41629 (F1) Unknown 200 200 37976938337 (F2) Unknown 200 200 306373334317	44.3% Average	Read 76 Write 78.2 Mixed 31.7 46% 62 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.27 84% 0.86 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 44.3% Great: 60%
Maxtor 6Y080M0 82GB-$60 722 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 25GB free (System drive) Firmware: YAR51BW0 Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (03) Spinup time 225 224 6031 (04) Start/Stop count 252 252 2152 (05) Reallocated sector count 166 166 889 (06) Read channel margin 253 253 0 (07) Seek error rate 253 252 0 (08) Seek timer performance 250 241 57664 (09) Power-on hours count 95 95 18883 (0A) Spinup retry count 253 252 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 253 252 0 (0C) Power cycle count 242 242 4522 (C0) Power-off retract count 253 253 0 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 253 253 0 (C2) HDA temperature 253 253 54 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 253 252 979 (C4) Reallocation count 253 253 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 253 253 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 253 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 196 1 346 (C8) Write error rate 253 252 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 253 172 177 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 253 252 0 (CB) Run out cancel 253 252 0 (CC) Soft ECC correction 253 252 0 (CD) Thermal asperity rate(TAR) 253 252 0 (CF) Spin high current 253 252 0 (D0) Spin buzz 253 252 0 (D1) Offline seek performance 195 180 0 (63) Unknown 253 253 0 (64) Unknown 253 253 0 (65) Unknown 253 253 0	29.9% Poor	Read 51.5 Write 52.3 Mixed 30 33% 44.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.25 4K Mixed 0.4 84% 0.68 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 29.9% Great: 32%
SanDisk Cruzer Edge 8GB 5,792 User benchmarks, average bench 11% 4GB free, PID 556b Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	6.2% Terrible	Read 14.4 Write 2.26 Mixed 3.83 6% 6.84 MB/s	4K Read 4.04 4K Write 0.87 4K Mixed 0.98 78% 1.96 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 6.2% Great: 13%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4GB 42,830 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 52217, 52217 MHz 2048, 2048 MB Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	21.9% Poor	MC Read 7.6 MC Write 6.2 MC Mixed 7.5 20% 7.1 GB/s	SC Read 5.3 SC Write 5.9 SC Mixed 6.3 17% 5.83 GB/s	Latency 97.5 41% 97.5 ns
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 21.9% Great: 46%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 960GC-GS FX Builds (Compare 130 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 50%

Yacht

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock 960GC-GS FX - $122

CPU
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	30x
FX-4300AMD $73Bench 52%, 55,454 samples	13x
FX-6100AMD $68Bench 54%, 44,863 samples	8x

GPU
Radeon 3000 GraphicsATIBench 1%, 21,841 samples	15x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	7x
GeForce 210NvidiaBench 1%, 98,254 samples	6x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	7x
T253X1120G 120GBTeamBench 65%, 1,708 samples	5x
SU650 120GBAdata $14Bench 63%, 42,288 samples	4x

RAM
8GBUnknownBench 34%, 82,857 samples	43x
16GBUnknownBench 41%, 70,565 samples	32x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	20x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 65% - Good

Total price: $197

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16