TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asrock 970 Pro3 R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 59%
Gunboat
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics103% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive95.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory28GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 28GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock 970 Pro3 R2.0  (all builds)
Memory24.7 GB free of 28 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160531
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 28 '21 at 13:26
Run Duration207 Seconds
Run User BGR-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8370-$175
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
69.1% Good
Memory 81.6
1-Core 81.2
2-Core 150
63% 104 Pts
4-Core 306
8-Core 492
49% 399 Pts
64-Core 476
30% 476 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑
This bench: 69.1%
 Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
Gigabyte(1458 3730)
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 466.47
Performing below potential (61st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
103% Outstanding
Lighting 130
Reflection 144
Parallax 131
106% 135 fps
MRender 118
Gravity 130
Splatting 122
101% 123 fps
Poor: 93% ↑
This bench: 103%
 Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Pro 512GB-$150
246GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVM02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 183 287 378 340 318 364 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
95.2% Outstanding
Read 495
Write 395
Mixed 433
SusWrite 312
92% 409 MB/s
4K Read 36.1
4K Write 73.8
4K Mixed 45.8
152% 51.9 MB/s
DQ Read 276
DQ Write 117
DQ Mixed 25.3
64% 140 MB/s
Poor: 79% ↑
This bench: 95.2%
 Great: 133%
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$129
207GB free
Firmware: EXM04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 191 364 424 435 437 435 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 487
Write 450
Mixed 360
SusWrite 381
94% 420 MB/s
4K Read 36.5
4K Write 76.2
4K Mixed 44.9
153% 52.5 MB/s
DQ Read 280
DQ Write 243
DQ Mixed 250
190% 258 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑
This bench: 102%
 Great: 124%
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85
100GB free
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 192 167 145 145 144 145 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
85.7% Excellent
Read 488
Write 446
Mixed 348
SusWrite 156
80% 359 MB/s
4K Read 36
4K Write 72.5
4K Mixed 41.9
147% 50.1 MB/s
DQ Read 264
DQ Write 239
DQ Mixed 146
138% 216 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑
This bench: 85.7%
 Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99P5471-016.A01LF 99U5471-034.A00LF 9905471-079.A00LF 99U5471-054.A00LF 28GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
42% Average
MC Read 16.4
MC Write 14.5
MC Mixed 13.1
42% 14.7 GB/s
SC Read 10.8
SC Write 9
SC Mixed 12.4
31% 10.7 GB/s
Latency 77.6
52% 77.6 ns
Poor: 43% ↑
This bench: 42%
 Great: 48%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical 970 Pro3 R2.0 Builds (Compare 789 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock 970 Pro3 R2.0 - $18

CPU
FX-6300AMD  $90Bench 55%, 261,607 samples194x
FX-8350AMD  $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples191x
FX-8320AMD  $125Bench 59%, 106,454 samples102x
GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia  $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples64x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia  $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples53x
RX 580AMD  $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples33x
SSD
A400 240GBKingston  $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples40x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung  $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples26x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston  $36Bench 54%, 339,020 samples17x
RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples27x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples16x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x4GBHyperX  $35Bench 51%, 38,490 samples12x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $195
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback