MSI Z68A-GD80 (B3) (MS-7672)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.32% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive59.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMSI MS-7672
MotherboardMSI Z68A-GD80 (B3) (MS-7672)  (all builds)
Memory5.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120718
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 28 '21 at 10:54
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3570K-$50
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
79.5% Very good
Memory 86
1-Core 106
2-Core 213
77% 135 Pts
4-Core 422
8-Core 427
57% 424 Pts
64-Core 425
26% 425 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 79.5%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)-$15
MSI(1462 2111) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4252
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
3.32% Terrible
Lighting 4
Reflection 1.9
Parallax 2.8
3% 2.9 fps
MRender 5.1
Gravity 2.4
Splatting 4.9
3% 4.13 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.32%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSDPR-CL100-240-G3 240GB
189GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T0521A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 228 226 224 225 227 227 MB/s
Performing below potential (32nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
59.2% Above average
Read 253
Write 224
Mixed 228
SusWrite 226
52% 233 MB/s
4K Read 23.8
4K Write 45.5
4K Mixed 22.5
89% 30.6 MB/s
DQ Read 180
DQ Write 188
DQ Mixed 44.3
72% 137 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 59.2%
Great: 89%
Intel Raid 5 Volume 640GB
596GB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.9 7.9 7.9 7.7 7.5 8.5 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
40.6% Average
Read 134
Write 7
Mixed 13.9
SusWrite 7.9
29% 40.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.6
113% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 40.6%
Great: 102%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CL8-8-8 DDR3-1600 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
53.4% Above average
MC Read 18.8
MC Write 19.1
MC Mixed 16.8
52% 18.2 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 17.6
SC Mixed 17.7
49% 17.1 GB/s
Latency 71.2
56% 71.2 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 53.4%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z68A-GD80 (B3) (MS-7672) Builds (Compare 18 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard

Motherboard: MSI Z68A-GD80 (B3) (MS-7672)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $621
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback