HP Mini 110

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP Mini 110  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 338D
Memory0.8 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1024 x 600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120613
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 28 '21 at 07:04
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User BGD-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Atom N2600
CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
42.2% Average
Memory 83.8
1-Core 5.5
2-Core 3.5
30% 30.9 Pts
4-Core 9
8-Core 7.6
1% 8.3 Pts
64-Core 11.3
1% 11.3 Pts
Poor: 13%
This bench: 42.2%
Great: 25%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST9320325AS 320GB-$34
66GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 33 25 26 34 28 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
17.4% Very poor
Read 32
Write 20.3
Mixed 12.5
SusWrite 28.3
17% 23.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.3
58% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 17.4%
Great: 39%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Nanya NT2GC64B88D0NS-CG 1x2GB
1 of 1 slots used
2GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
11.3% Very poor
MC Read 3
MC Write 2.8
MC Mixed 2.9
8% 2.9 GB/s
SC Read 1.3
SC Write 2
SC Mixed 1.3
4% 1.53 GB/s
Latency 73.8
54% 73.8 ns
Poor: 9%
This bench: 11.3%
Great: 29%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback