Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 55% Yacht	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	3.31% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	56.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2920XM 906 User benchmarks, average bench 62% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	59.4% Above average	Memory 82.2 1-Core 64.3 2-Core 111 55% 85.8 Pts	4-Core 200 8-Core 335 32% 267 Pts	64-Core 338 21% 338 Pts
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 59.4% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 1000M 6,108 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Dell(1028 04A3) 2GB CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 369.09 Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	3.31% Terrible	Lighting 3.9 Reflection 6 Parallax 2.3 3% 4.07 fps	MRender 5.7 Gravity 4.6 Splatting 3.3 4% 4.53 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.31% Great: 3%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung PM871 2.5 7mm 128GB 2,429 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 23GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02D0Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 99 99 100 99 92 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	56.1% Above average	Read 447 Write 154 Mixed 165 SusWrite 99.5 47% 216 MB/s	4K Read 17.6 4K Write 30 4K Mixed 19.1 67% 22.2 MB/s	DQ Read 383 DQ Write 132 DQ Mixed 168 148% 228 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 56.1% Great: 87%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5273DH0-CH9 M471B5773DH0-CK0 Kingston SNY1333D3S9DR8/2G M471B5773DH0-CK0 10GB 9 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	37.9% Below average	MC Read 13.3 MC Write 12.7 MC Mixed 11.8 36% 12.6 GB/s	SC Read 11 SC Write 12.1 SC Mixed 12.4 34% 11.8 GB/s	Latency 76.6 52% 76.6 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 37.9% Great: 46%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 54%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

GPU
Quadro 1000MNvidiaBench 3%, 6,108 samples	227x
Quadro 2000MNvidiaBench 5%, 3,227 samples	171x
HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 110,588 samples	85x

RAM
M471B5273DH0-CH9 2x4GBSamsungBench 43%, 15,815 samples	26x
HMT351S6CFR8C-H9 2x4GBHynixBench 43%, 6,386 samples	16x
M471B5273DH0-CH9 4x4GBSamsungBench 45%, 885 samples	12x

Value: 65% - Good

Total price: $113

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16