Asus TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics20.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive85.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory26.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200528
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 28 '21 at 03:13
Run Duration451 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4700G Graphics
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4.4 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
89.4% Excellent
Memory 62.1
1-Core 155
2-Core 311
91% 176 Pts
4-Core 622
8-Core 1,242
110% 932 Pts
64-Core 1,547
96% 1,547 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 89.4%
Great: 98%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 4000 (iGPU)
AMD(1002 1636) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 21.5.2
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
20.4% Poor
Lighting 26.7
Reflection 20.8
Parallax 35
22% 27.5 fps
MRender 10.8
Gravity 28.7
Splatting 23.9
18% 21.1 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 20.4%
Great: 17%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ Vertex 3 240GB-$80
169GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 183 200 209 214 206 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
85.4% Excellent
Read 402
Write 251
Mixed 284
SusWrite 196
63% 283 MB/s
4K Read 32.4
4K Write 86.2
4K Mixed 40.5
147% 53 MB/s
DQ Read 306
DQ Write 239
DQ Mixed 241
189% 262 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 85.4%
Great: 91%
WDC WD140EDFZ-11A0VA0 14TB
5TB free
Firmware: 81.00A81
SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 166 161 162 166 167 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 226
Write 224
Mixed 144
SusWrite 163
42% 189 MB/s
DQ Read 8.1
DQ Write 9.9
DQ Mixed 6.4
6% 8.13 MB/s
4K Read 4.7
4K Write 11.3
20% 8 MB/s
Poor: 16% Great: 26%
SABRENT 1TB
785GB free
Firmware: RKT303.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1827 1001 1000 920 912 108 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
SABRENT 1TB
762GB free
Firmware: RKT303.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1889 950 1002 1005 1007 1007 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
SABRENT 1TB
721GB free
Firmware: RKT303.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1650 1014 997 1009 1006 1010 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
SABRENT 1TB
785GB free
Firmware: RKT303.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1824 1002 934 1002 1000 993 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW16GX4M2Z3200C16 CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
66.2% Good
MC Read 25.4
MC Write 25
MC Mixed 21.4
68% 23.9 GB/s
SC Read 18.5
SC Write 23.7
SC Mixed 19.4
59% 20.5 GB/s
Latency 121
33% 121 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 66.2%
Great: 106%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS Builds (Compare 3,596 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 143%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 85% - Excellent Total price: $713
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback