Asrock A320M-HDV

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive168% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock A320M-HDV  (all builds)
Memory28.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170717
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 28 '21 at 00:43
Run Duration164 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1600-$110
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
73.9% Very good
Memory 72.9
1-Core 108
2-Core 215
73% 132 Pts
4-Core 403
8-Core 678
66% 540 Pts
64-Core 836
52% 836 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 73.9%
Great: 78%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB
198GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 211070WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 477 221 220 220 220 220 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
168% Outstanding
Read 1,474
Write 919
Mixed 1002
SusWrite 263
203% 915 MB/s
4K Read 47.1
4K Write 112
4K Mixed 64.5
213% 74.4 MB/s
DQ Read 680
DQ Write 525
DQ Mixed 578
439% 595 MB/s
Poor: 119%
This bench: 168%
Great: 199%
SG-240GB-SSD 240GB
157GB free
Firmware: S0918A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 397 101 122 18 58 58 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
70.1% Very good
Read 446
Write 392
Mixed 321
SusWrite 126
72% 321 MB/s
4K Read 26.1
4K Write 86.7
4K Mixed 25.7
118% 46.2 MB/s
DQ Read 78.8
DQ Write 332
DQ Mixed 36.7
77% 149 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 70.1%
Great: 85%
Sandisk PLUS 480G 480GB
447GB free
Firmware: Z32060RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 406 413 320 139 129 115 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
70.6% Very good
Read 439
Write 410
Mixed 352
SusWrite 254
82% 364 MB/s
4K Read 15.1
4K Write 78.9
4K Mixed 18.3
88% 37.4 MB/s
DQ Read 206
DQ Write 301
DQ Mixed 30
85% 179 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 70.6%
Great: 75%
WD Purple Surveillance 4TB (2017)-$71
244GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 81 82 79 82 80 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
67.5% Good
Read 154
Write 144
Mixed 83.6
SusWrite 80.7
85% 116 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.1
216% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 67.5%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905701-008.A00G 9905701-003.A00G 32GB
2400, 2400 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
86.7% Excellent
MC Read 33.2
MC Write 31.4
MC Mixed 29.6
90% 31.4 GB/s
SC Read 22.9
SC Write 31.9
SC Mixed 26
77% 26.9 GB/s
Latency 94.9
42% 94.9 ns
Poor: 81%
This bench: 86.7%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A320M-HDV Builds (Compare 840 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock A320M-HDV

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 99% - Outstanding Total price: $230
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback