bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics9.94% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory5GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 5GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced. Very high background CPU (38%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemVMware, VMware7,1
MotherboardIntel 440BX Desktop Reference Platform
Memory1.3 GB free of 5 GB @ 0 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200515
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 27 '21 at 21:52
Run Duration89 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 38%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
47.3% Average
Memory 63.8
1-Core 93.9
2-Core 192
64% 116 Pts
4-Core 186
8-Core 148
23% 167 Pts
64-Core 181
11% 181 Pts
Poor: 22%
This bench: 47.3%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Vmware SVGA 3D
Vmware(15AD 0405)
Driver: vm3dum64_loader.dll Ver. 8.17.2.14
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
9.94% Terrible
Lighting 13.3
Reflection 12.1
Parallax 17.1
11% 14.2 fps
MRender 4.4
Gravity 4.7
Splatting 17.6
8% 8.9 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 9.94%
Great: 69%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Vmware, VMware Virtual S 64GB
8GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,527
Write 1,481
Mixed 1,198
313% 1,402 MB/s
4K Read 24.3
4K Write 34.5
4K Mixed 36.7
102% 31.8 MB/s
DQ Read 70.6
DQ Write 66.5
DQ Mixed 66.1
50% 67.7 MB/s
Poor: 35% Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
VMware Virtual RAM VMW-4096MB Virtual RAM VMW-1024MB 5GB
0, 0 MHz
4096, 1024 MB
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
34.7% Below average
MC Read 11.5
MC Write 13.3
MC Mixed 12
35% 12.3 GB/s
SC Read 9.1
SC Write 9.9
SC Mixed 9.3
27% 9.43 GB/s
Latency 117
34% 117 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 34.7%
Great: 91%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,497 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback