HP Compaq 8100 Elite CMT PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics0.78% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 16GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP Compaq 8100 Elite CMT PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 304Bh
Memory10.7 GB free of 16.0039 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100609
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 27 '21 at 21:26
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5 650-$70
XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.35 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
50.3% Above average
Memory 65
1-Core 86.2
2-Core 152
58% 101 Pts
4-Core 207
8-Core 210
28% 208 Pts
64-Core 194
12% 194 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 50.3%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Clarkdale 0.733/0.9 GHz)
HP(103C 304B) 3.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2900
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.78% Terrible
Lighting 0.9
Reflection 1.7
Parallax 0.5
1% 1.03 fps
MRender 1.6
Gravity 0.4
Splatting 1.2
1% 1.07 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.78%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$182
135GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 565 198 70 110 201 213 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 71% Great: 124%
Hitachi Deskstar 7K1000.C 1TB-$70
426GB free
Firmware: JP4OA3GH
SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 98 98 82 92 98 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
49.2% Average
Read 85.4
Write 78.7
Mixed 46.6
SusWrite 85.8
54% 74.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
133% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 49.2%
Great: 74%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ID:85 9B CT51264BA160B.C16 ID:85 9B CT51264BA160B.C16 ID:85 9B CT51264BA160B.C16 ID:85 9B CT51264BA160B.C16 52GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 0 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 36864 MB
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
30.9% Below average
MC Read 10.3
MC Write 8.9
MC Mixed 13.4
31% 10.9 GB/s
SC Read 8.6
SC Write 7.1
SC Mixed 8.4
23% 8.03 GB/s
Latency 114
35% 114 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 30.9%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq 8100 Elite CMT PC Builds (Compare 660 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq 8100 Elite CMT PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $98
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback