HP OMEN 25L Desktop GT12-0xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 91%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 85%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics92.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive259% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHP OMEN 25L Desktop GT12-0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8703
Memory23.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210201
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateMay 27 '21 at 20:03
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10600K-$129
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4.1 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
94.8% Outstanding
Memory 86.4
1-Core 144
2-Core 283
94% 171 Pts
4-Core 555
8-Core 864
88% 709 Pts
64-Core 1,148
71% 1,148 Pts
Poor: 81%
This bench: 94.8%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$271
HP(103C 8557) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 462.30
Performing below potential (72nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
92.3% Outstanding
Lighting 117
Reflection 96.1
Parallax 111
95% 108 fps
MRender 137
Gravity 107
Splatting 85.5
87% 110 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 92.3%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDS100T3XHC-00SJG0 1TB
751GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 102000WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1848 1513 1516 1515 1518 1517 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
259% Outstanding
Read 1,930
Write 2,096
Mixed 1620
SusWrite 1,571
407% 1,804 MB/s
4K Read 39.4
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 55.3
185% 65.6 MB/s
DQ Read 774
DQ Write 491
DQ Mixed 656
483% 640 MB/s
Poor: 194%
This bench: 259%
Great: 334%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
272GB free
Firmware: 03.01A03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 171 171 170 171 169 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 183
Write 150
Mixed 104
SusWrite 170
112% 152 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.2
227% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 101%
Great: 109%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$50
1TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 124 127 134 130 131 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
62.8% Good
Read 90.1
Write 91.2
Mixed 67.6
SusWrite 129
70% 94.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.1
56% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 62.8%
Great: 106%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HP32D4U8S8HC-8X KHX3200C16D4/8GX HP32D4U8S8HC-8X KHX3200C16D4/8GX 32GB
3200, 3200, 3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
79.6% Very good
MC Read 28.8
MC Write 30.9
MC Mixed 24.6
80% 28.1 GB/s
SC Read 16.9
SC Write 33.7
SC Mixed 25.2
72% 25.3 GB/s
Latency 70.9
56% 70.9 ns
Poor: 76%
This bench: 79.6%
Great: 107%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical OMEN 25L Desktop GT12-0xxx Builds (Compare 3,655 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 84%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 82%
Aircraft carrier

System: HP OMEN 25L Desktop GT12-0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $491
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback