Supermicro X8SIE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics20.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive27.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemSupermicro X8SIE  (all builds)
MotherboardSupermicro X8SIE
Memory8.3 GB free of 12 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, 1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120627
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 27 '21 at 02:21
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon X3470
CPU, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
64.5% Good
Memory 82.6
1-Core 86.2
2-Core 154
64% 108 Pts
4-Core 252
8-Core 387
40% 320 Pts
64-Core 386
24% 386 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 64.5%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 570-$350
Asus(1043 8387) 1.2GB
CLim: 742 MHz, MLim: 950 MHz, Ram: 1.2GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
20.2% Poor
Lighting 23.5
Reflection 38.5
Parallax 28
19% 30 fps
MRender 37.4
Gravity 20.8
Splatting 24.6
22% 27.6 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 20.2%
Great: 22%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
93GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1H6
SusWrite @10s intervals: 181 166 173 202 176 176 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
27.8% Poor
Read 136
Write 95.3
Mixed 79.4
SusWrite 179
28% 122 MB/s
4K Read 10.7
4K Write 15.6
4K Mixed 8.6
36% 11.6 MB/s
DQ Read 15.6
DQ Write 16.3
DQ Mixed 14.6
11% 15.5 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 27.8%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT125R7BFR8C-G7 6x2GB
6 of 6 slots used
12GB DIMM DDR3 800 MHz
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
28.3% Poor
MC Read 9.1
MC Write 8.9
MC Mixed 8.1
25% 8.7 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 11
SC Mixed 9.3
28% 9.9 GB/s
Latency 75.9
53% 75.9 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 28.3%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X8SIE Builds (Compare 22 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Supermicro X8SIE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products, which UserBenchmark reveals.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback