HP OMEN by HP Laptop 15-ce0xx

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics4.09% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemHP OMEN by HP Laptop 15-ce0xx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 838F
Memory11.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190418
Uptime2.7 Days
Run DateMay 26 '21 at 21:42
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User EST-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
74% Very good
Memory 79.6
1-Core 101
2-Core 200
72% 127 Pts
4-Core 397
8-Core 387
53% 392 Pts
64-Core 396
24% 396 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 74%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 630
HP(103C 838F) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 24.20.100.6344
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
4.09% Terrible
Lighting 5.5
Reflection 21.3
Parallax 5.8
4% 10.9 fps
MRender 8.5
Gravity 5.4
Splatting 0.1
3% 4.67 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.09%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
ST1000LM049-2GH172 480GB
350GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK61K1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 348 237 99 100 98 101 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 452
Write 310
Mixed 330
SusWrite 164
70% 314 MB/s
4K Read 29.3
4K Write 60.6
4K Mixed 32.9
119% 40.9 MB/s
DQ Read 314
DQ Write 299
DQ Mixed 221
189% 278 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX2400C14S4/8G Hynix HMA81GS6CJR8N-VK 16GB
2400, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
71.3% Very good
MC Read 26.2
MC Write 29.1
MC Mixed 21.7
73% 25.7 GB/s
SC Read 15.3
SC Write 25.5
SC Mixed 20.8
59% 20.5 GB/s
Latency 81.3
49% 81.3 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 71.3%
Great: 73%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical OMEN by HP Laptop 15-ce0xx Builds (Compare 3,375 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP OMEN by HP Laptop 15-ce0xx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback