Asrock N68C-S UCC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics19.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive43.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock N68C-S UCC  (all builds)
Memory2 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110919
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 26 '21 at 09:04
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X3 445-$100
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 3 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
41.7% Average
Memory 60.5
1-Core 45.1
2-Core 90.5
41% 65.4 Pts
4-Core 134
8-Core 134
18% 134 Pts
64-Core 136
8% 136 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 41.7%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R7 260X-$120
CLim: 1050 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 17.1.1
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
19.5% Very poor
Lighting 24
Reflection 25.9
Parallax 31.5
20% 27.1 fps
MRender 23.7
Gravity 23.1
Splatting 24
19% 23.6 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 19.5%
Great: 22%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ ARC 100 120GB-$82
73GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 171 164 184 186 151 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
43.5% Average
Read 195
Write 176
Mixed 148
SusWrite 168
39% 172 MB/s
4K Read 13.8
4K Write 51.7
4K Mixed 19
73% 28.2 MB/s
DQ Read 29
DQ Write 112
DQ Mixed 32.4
36% 57.8 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 43.5%
Great: 98%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$25
415GB free
Firmware: CC38
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 120 121 123 123 119 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
60.5% Good
Read 90.1
Write 98.3
Mixed 47.7
SusWrite 121
65% 89.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1
174% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 60.5%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR2
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
20.6% Poor
MC Read 7.4
MC Write 6.1
MC Mixed 7.2
20% 6.9 GB/s
SC Read 5
SC Write 5.7
SC Mixed 6.2
16% 5.63 GB/s
Latency 126
32% 126 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 20.6%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical N68C-S UCC Builds (Compare 214 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock N68C-S UCC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback