Gigabyte GA-H110M-M2-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.94% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive57.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (59%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemGigabyte H110M-M.2
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H110M-M2-CF  (all builds)
Memory2.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170222
Uptime13.8 Days
Run DateMay 26 '21 at 05:35
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 59%

 PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium G4400-$45
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
42.6% Average
Memory 63.6
1-Core 82.2
2-Core 186
61% 111 Pts
4-Core 121
8-Core 156
18% 139 Pts
64-Core 160
10% 160 Pts
Poor: 23%
This bench: 42.6%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 510 (Desktop Skylake)
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9466
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
1.94% Terrible
Lighting 2.9
Reflection 2.7
Parallax 3.6
2% 3.07 fps
MRender 4.4
Gravity 0.2
Splatting 0.2
1% 1.6 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.94%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 960GB-$54
23GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR022
SusWrite @10s intervals: 217 173 134 1.8 2.7 2.8 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
57.7% Above average
Read 392
Write 203
Mixed 274
SusWrite 88.6
53% 239 MB/s
4K Read 17.6
4K Write 71.6
4K Mixed 21.6
92% 36.9 MB/s
DQ Read 202
DQ Write 189
DQ Mixed 40.6
73% 144 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 57.7%
Great: 91%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
166GB free
Firmware: KC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 58 62 71 72 77 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
28.5% Poor
Read 32.3
Write 30.6
Mixed 17.1
SusWrite 65.5
26% 36.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 5.4
4K Mixed 0.4
169% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 28.5%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
VETEKE 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
35.3% Below average
MC Read 12.7
MC Write 12.9
MC Mixed 12
36% 12.5 GB/s
SC Read 9.9
SC Write 8.5
SC Mixed 10.3
27% 9.57 GB/s
Latency 117
34% 117 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 35.3%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H110M-M2-CF Builds (Compare 370 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H110M-M2-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $157
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback