Lenovo 80WK

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics17.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive168% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 80WK  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory8.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171017
Uptime4.3 Days
Run DateMay 25 '21 at 21:48
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User HRV-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
68.7% Good
Memory 75.8
1-Core 93.3
2-Core 190
68% 120 Pts
4-Core 358
8-Core 352
48% 355 Pts
64-Core 360
22% 360 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 68.7%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050 (Mobile)
Legend(17AA 39D1) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 27.21.14.6589
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
17.7% Very poor
Lighting 23.3
Reflection 34.5
Parallax 23.4
19% 27.1 fps
MRender 34.6
Gravity 29.3
Splatting 0.3
15% 21.4 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 17.7%
Great: 25%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLW128HEGR-000L2 128GB
63GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4L1QCXB7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 240 168 168 169 168 168 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
168% Outstanding
Read 1,654
Write 746
Mixed 567
SusWrite 180
172% 787 MB/s
4K Read 43.8
4K Write 77.9
4K Mixed 54
177% 58.6 MB/s
DQ Read 872
DQ Write 745
DQ Mixed 692
550% 770 MB/s
Poor: 90%
This bench: 168%
Great: 320%
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2004)-$47
596GB free
Firmware: 03.01A03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 87 88 86 86 86 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
44% Average
Read 66.5
Write 65
Mixed 36.9
SusWrite 86.6
47% 63.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
117% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 44%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CRC Transcend JM2666HSB-8G 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
73.4% Very good
MC Read 27.1
MC Write 31.6
MC Mixed 22.8
78% 27.2 GB/s
SC Read 13.7
SC Write 24
SC Mixed 18.1
53% 18.6 GB/s
Latency 88.6
45% 88.6 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 73.4%
Great: 76%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 80WK Builds (Compare 6,977 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 80WK

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback