Acer Aspire 8735

Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 33% Sail boat	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	2.3% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	28.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

7 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	Acer Aspire 8735 (all builds)
Motherboard	Acer JV80
Memory	1.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20090818
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Jul 17 '17 at 15:54
Run Duration	152 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo T6600 8,673 User benchmarks, average bench 35% U2E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	34.2% Below average	Memory 64.5 1-Core 9.6 2-Core 25.5 27% 33.2 Pts	4-Core 24.8 8-Core 45.9 4% 35.3 Pts	64-Core 40.3 2% 40.3 Pts
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 34.2% Great: 41%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 240M 2,359 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Acer(1025 0299) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 341.81 Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	2.3% Terrible	Lighting 2.6 Reflection 2.88 Parallax 1.28 2% 2.26 fps	MRender 4.57 Gravity 2.23 Splatting 3.04 3% 3.28 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.3% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel 330 Series 120GB-$188 11,188 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 6GB free (System drive) Firmware: 300i Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	28.4% Poor	Read 239 Write 116 Mixed 147 37% 167 MB/s	4K Read 8.57 4K Write 14.7 4K Mixed 7.7 31% 10.3 MB/s	DQ Read 58.3 DQ Write 50.1 DQ Mixed 33.8 31% 47.4 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 28.4% Great: 80%
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB (2009)-$50 31,419 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 141GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	26.1% Poor	Read 46.8 Write 44.1 Mixed 37.2 32% 42.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.17 4K Write 0.91 4K Mixed 0.22 48% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 26.1% Great: 43%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM 15h Reserved Performing below potential (8^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	9.94% Terrible	MC Read 3.1 MC Write 2.6 MC Mixed 3.1 8% 2.93 GB/s	SC Read 1.8 SC Write 1.5 SC Mixed 1.3 4% 1.53 GB/s	Latency 115 35% 115 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 9.94% Great: 44%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Aspire 8735 Builds (Compare 22 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 36%

Jet ski

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire 8735

CPU
Core2 Duo P7450Intel $90Bench 36%, 2,755 samples	4x
Core2 Duo T6600IntelBench 35%, 8,673 samples	4x
Pentium T4400Intel $110Bench 34%, 7,903 samples	4x

GPU
GeForce GT 240MNvidiaBench 2%, 2,359 samples	14x
GeForce G210MNvidiaBench 1%, 1,370 samples	8x

SSD
Burst 120GBPatriotBench 66%, 15,567 samples	2x
Solid State Disk 512GBSpccBench 71%, 30,264 samples	2x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $38Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	1x

RAM
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	13x
6GBUnknownBench 25%, 111,301 samples	5x
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 48% - Average

Total price: $90

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $37
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80	Nvidia RTX 4070 $542	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16