Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 31.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	1.68% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (39%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium N4200 10,928 User benchmarks, average bench 30% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	31.9% Below average	Memory 33.5 1-Core 49 2-Core 94.2 33% 58.9 Pts	4-Core 174 8-Core 185 24% 179 Pts	64-Core 185 12% 185 Pts
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 31.9% Great: 38%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 505 2,850 User benchmarks, average bench 2% HP(103C 82EE) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8984 Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	1.68% Terrible	Lighting 2 Reflection 1.7 Parallax 2.3 2% 2 fps	MRender 2.2 Gravity 1.8 Splatting 2.4 2% 2.13 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.68% Great: 3%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZNLN256HAJQ-000H1 256GB 4,927 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 178GB free (System drive) Firmware: MVT24H3Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 345 Write 305 Mixed 319 72% 323 MB/s	4K Read 13.2 4K Write 31.1 4K Mixed 28.5 73% 24.3 MB/s	DQ Read 204 DQ Write 193 DQ Mixed 195 148% 198 MB/s
Poor: 52% Great: 113%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 4KTF51264HZ-1G6A1 2x4GB 203 User benchmarks, average bench 22% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	30.4% Below average	MC Read 11.6 MC Write 13.8 MC Mixed 10.8 34% 12.1 GB/s	SC Read 3.3 SC Write 4.7 SC Mixed 4.3 12% 4.1 GB/s	Latency 235 17% 235 ns
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 30.4% Great: 28%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 28%

Raft

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Celeron N3450IntelBench 27%, 6,637 samples	98x
Pentium N4200IntelBench 30%, 10,928 samples	76x
Celeron N3350IntelBench 21%, 14,922 samples	15x

GPU
HD Graphics 500IntelBench 1%, 7,914 samples	97x
HD Graphics 505IntelBench 2%, 2,850 samples	68x
HD GraphicsIntelBench 1%, 15,538 samples	16x

SSD
MZNLN128HAHQ-000H1 128GBSamsungBench 78%, 14,590 samples	77x
SD8SN8U-128G-1006 128GBSandiskBench 66%, 10,347 samples	53x
SD9SN8W-128G-1006 128GBSandiskBench 69%, 8,741 samples	30x

RAM
K4BDG1646Q-HYKO 2x2GBSamsungBench 26%, 1,004 samples	143x
H5TC4G63CFR-PBA 2x2GBHynixBench 25%, 295 samples	23x
HMT851S6CMR6A-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 27%, 219 samples	14x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16