Intel CRESCENTBAY

Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 38% Jet ski	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	2.94% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	34.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (99%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 73% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Intel CRESCENTBAY (all builds)
Memory	9.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150829
Uptime	5.9 Days
Run Date	May 24 '21 at 23:32
Run Duration	168 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	99%
CPU Throttled	73%

PC Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4650U 4,310 User benchmarks, average bench 51% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	36.4% Below average	Memory 53 1-Core 51.7 2-Core 86.6 39% 63.8 Pts	4-Core 109 8-Core 158 17% 134 Pts	64-Core 159 10% 159 Pts
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 36.4% Great: 60%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 5000 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz) 6,906 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Intel(8086 0A26) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4835 Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	2.94% Terrible	Lighting 3.4 Reflection 2.6 Parallax 6 3% 4 fps	MRender 4.6 Gravity 2.6 Splatting 4.6 3% 3.93 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.94% Great: 5%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial M4 256GB-$218 17,938 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 64GB free (System drive) Firmware: 04MH SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 123 126 137 172 162 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	34.7% Below average	Read 262 Write 43.9 Mixed 152 SusWrite 139 33% 149 MB/s	4K Read 9.2 4K Write 22.7 4K Mixed 8.3 37% 13.4 MB/s	DQ Read 110 DQ Write 105 DQ Mixed 23.7 41% 79.6 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 34.7% Great: 74%
Samsung MZMTE512HMHP-000MV 512GB 975 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 476GB free Firmware: EXT42M0Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 219 233 282 261 327 324 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	59.1% Above average	Read 313 Write 273 Mixed 154 SusWrite 274 57% 254 MB/s	4K Read 14.6 4K Write 27 4K Mixed 16.7 58% 19.4 MB/s	DQ Read 328 DQ Write 213 DQ Mixed 80.7 111% 207 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 59.1% Great: 94%
Seagate ST4000LM016-1N2170 4TB 2,075 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 2TB free Firmware: 0003 SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 73 51 51 45 47 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	22% Poor	Read 22.4 Write 42.4 Mixed 38.4 SusWrite 53 29% 39.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Write 4.2 4K Mixed 0.3 119% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 22% Great: 66%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung MT451U6MFR8C-PB 2x8GB 10 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Relative performance (0^th percentile)	29.3% Poor	MC Read 9.7 MC Write 13.4 MC Mixed 6.9 29% 10 GB/s	SC Read 8.4 SC Write 9.2 SC Mixed 12.1 28% 9.9 GB/s	Latency 150 27% 150 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 29.3% Great: 55%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical CRESCENTBAY Builds (Compare 195 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 47%

Yacht

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Intel CRESCENTBAY

CPU
Core i7-5500UIntelBench 46%, 73,655 samples	22x
Core i5-4200UIntel $281Bench 43%, 64,450 samples	18x
Core i7-4500UIntel $393Bench 50%, 39,249 samples	13x

GPU
HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 275,372 samples	81x
HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz)IntelBench 4%, 231,498 samples	50x
HD 6000 (Mobile)IntelBench 6%, 5,021 samples	20x

SSD
SSD 128GBHoodiskBench 69%, 496 samples	9x
KingFast 256GBBench 72%, 7,147 samples	6x
MT-128 128GBBench 61%, 290 samples	5x

RAM
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	12x
99U5428-018.A00LF 1x8GBKingstonBench 26%, 6,120 samples	10x
CT102464BF160B.M16 1x8GBCrucialBench 26%, 4,731 samples	7x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	WD Black SN850X M.2 4TB $293