| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 33% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 451% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Run History
| Motherboard | Asus 970 PRO GAMING/AURA (all builds) |
| Memory | 13.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20161107 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Jul 17 '17 at 12:29 |
| Run Duration | 168 Seconds |
| Run User | MEX-User |
| Background CPU | 7% |
PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
73.2%
Very good
|
65% 107 Pts
|
47% 381 Pts
|
29% 471 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 670-$435
Asus(1043 841B) 2GB
CLim: 1333 MHz, MLim: 1571 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 382.53
|
33%
Below average
|
32% 42.1 fps
|
35% 43.7 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
135GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
|
451%
Outstanding
|
746% 3,336 MB/s
|
365% 106 MB/s
|
71% 118 MB/s
|
|
|
78.3%
Very good
|
95% 127 MB/s
|
73% 0.7 MB/s
| |
|
Samsung G3 Station 2TB
301GB free, PID 6014
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
|
13.5%
Very poor
|
38% 30 MB/s
|
41% 0.59 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing below potential (32nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
53.3%
Above average
|
54% 19.1 GB/s
|
34% 11.7 GB/s
|
63% 63.1 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical 970 PRO GAMING/AURA Builds (Compare 902 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus 970 PRO GAMING/AURA - $299
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 431x |
| FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 112x |
| FX-8370AMD $175Bench 62%, 34,720 samples | 85x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 86x |
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 66x |
| RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 51x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 62% - Good | Total price: $588 |