Asrock B450M Steel Legend

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 74%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 69%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics86.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive197% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock B450M Steel Legend  (all builds)
Memory11.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200713
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 24 '21 at 14:52
Run Duration176 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X-$185
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
79.2% Very good
Memory 80.7
1-Core 117
2-Core 226
79% 141 Pts
4-Core 419
8-Core 686
68% 552 Pts
64-Core 919
57% 919 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 79.2%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200
MSI(1462 C75C) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 466.47
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
86.2% Excellent
Lighting 101
Reflection 102
Parallax 107
82% 104 fps
MRender 154
Gravity 104
Splatting 94.3
93% 117 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 86.2%
Great: 112%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SA2000M8500G 500GB
195GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S5Z42105
SusWrite @10s intervals: 721 534 540 541 541 541 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
197% Outstanding
Read 1,593
Write 706
Mixed 1,085
SusWrite 569
219% 988 MB/s
4K Read 54.8
4K Write 108
4K Mixed 69.7
229% 77.4 MB/s
DQ Read 772
DQ Write 454
DQ Mixed 241
279% 489 MB/s
Poor: 118%
This bench: 197%
Great: 277%
Toshiba A100 120GB
48GB free
Firmware: SBFA10.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 206 75 5.3 95 112 98 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
82.5% Excellent
Read 484
Write 404
Mixed 345
SusWrite 98.3
74% 333 MB/s
4K Read 34.3
4K Write 76.3
4K Mixed 35.9
138% 48.8 MB/s
DQ Read 334
DQ Write 333
DQ Mixed 215
194% 294 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 82.5%
Great: 89%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$100
259GB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 114 114 117 116 115 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
62.5% Good
Read 103
Write 97.4
Mixed 66.8
SusWrite 114
70% 95.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
197% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 62.5%
Great: 88%
WD Green 500GB (2012)
51GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 100 100 101 101 97 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
60.5% Good
Read 111
Write 104
Mixed 78.3
SusWrite 99.8
72% 98.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 0.9
188% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 60.5%
Great: 79%
WD WD10EACS-00ZJB0 1TB
54GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 46 46 46 47 47 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
28.8% Poor
Read 53.5
Write 50.5
Mixed 38.7
SusWrite 46.3
35% 47.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.8
155% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 28.8%
Great: 51%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BL8G30C15U4BL.M8FE1 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
96.6% Outstanding
MC Read 38.8
MC Write 33.2
MC Mixed 33.1
100% 35 GB/s
SC Read 25.4
SC Write 34
SC Mixed 28.3
84% 29.2 GB/s
Latency 79.3
50% 79.3 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 96.6%
Great: 107%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B450M Steel Legend Builds (Compare 8,161 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asrock B450M Steel Legend - $90

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 79% - Very good Total price: $492
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback