Biostar H55A+

Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 61% Destroyer	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	8.17% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	42.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Biostar H55A+ (all builds)
Memory	2.3 GB free of 6 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100927
Uptime	5.2 Days
Run Date	Jul 17 '17 at 01:43
Run Duration	3210 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	11%

PC Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon X3430 4,096 User benchmarks, average bench 61% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	62.2% Good	Memory 89.9 1-Core 64.4 2-Core 129 59% 94.3 Pts	4-Core 198 8-Core 226 28% 212 Pts	64-Core 255 16% 255 Pts
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 62.2% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 780 Ti 78 User benchmarks, average bench 8% Device(0000 0000) ≥ 4GB CLim: 783 MHz, MLim: 850 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 384.76 Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	8.17% Terrible	Lighting 9.53 Reflection 11.1 Parallax 8 8% 9.55 fps	MRender 12.5 Gravity 9.87 Splatting 10.7 9% 11 fps
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 8.17% Great: 8%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
ACJC2M128S25 127GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 80GB free (System drive) Firmware: 20151204 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 703 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1011 (A0) Unknown 100 100 0 (A1) Unknown 100 100 70 (A2) Unknown 100 100 1 (A3) Unknown 100 100 2 (A4) Unknown 100 100 102095 (A5) Unknown 100 100 117 (A6) Unknown 100 100 65 (A7) Unknown 100 100 99 (A8) Unknown 100 100 3000 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 405 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 39 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 13729 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 2 (F1) Unknown 100 100 139458 (F2) Unknown 100 100 169762 (F5) Unknown 100 100 300236	42.7% Average	Read 257 Write 151 Mixed 191 44% 200 MB/s	4K Read 17.4 4K Write 58.2 4K Mixed 3.05 61% 26.2 MB/s	DQ Read 157 DQ Write 135 DQ Mixed 15.9 47% 102 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 42.7% Great: 61%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 121GB free Firmware: CC46 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 118 100 188910576 (03) Spinup time 97 97 0 (04) Start/Stop count 97 97 3772 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 66 60 4709106 (09) Power-on hours count 92 92 7686 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1386 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 99 99 1 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 1 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 67 51 589103137 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 497 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 94 94 13204 (C2) HDA temperature 33 49 47244640289 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 1 119012 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -120774480363087 (F1) Unknown 100 253 7733173366 (F2) Unknown 100 253 4396727019	51.1% Above average	Read 88.1 Write 90.2 Mixed 89 67% 89.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.69 4K Write 0.91 4K Mixed 0.19 67% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 51.1% Great: 112%
Samsung HD322HJ 320GB-$44 40,147 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 85GB free Firmware: 1AC01118 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (49^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 92 92 3260 (04) Start/Stop count 96 96 3877 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 90 90 50785 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 1 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2232 (0D) Soft read error rate 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 74 60 437649434 (C2) HDA temperature 74 56 487981082 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 32227 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 5 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 253 253 0	45.6% Average	Read 78.1 Write 80.5 Mixed 76.2 59% 78.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.62 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.5 120% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 45.6% Great: 62%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$36 203,102 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 6GB free Firmware: CC38 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 117 99 151666017 (03) Spinup time 97 97 0 (04) Start/Stop count 74 74 27445 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 77 60 51854491 (09) Power-on hours count 60 60 35718 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2155 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 99 12885098501 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 68 50 605814816 (C2) HDA temperature 32 50 47244640288 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 25 19 151666017 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 167 82317 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -42863773574252 (F1) Unknown 100 253 1718008372 (F2) Unknown 100 253 694831316	38.1% Below average	Read 66.7 Write 66 Mixed 61 48% 64.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.66 4K Write 1.42 4K Mixed 0.61 122% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 38.1% Great: 70%
MAXTOR S TM3250310AS 250GB 31GB free, PID 0c15 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	17.2% Very poor	Read 36 Write 37.4 Mixed 15.5 36% 29.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.57 4K Write 1.19 4K Mixed 0.38 56% 0.71 MB/s

SAMSUNG HD103SI 1TB 377 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 10GB free, PID 2329 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	15.5% Very poor	Read 32.5 Write 29.4 Mixed 30.4 39% 30.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.48 4K Write 1.39 4K Mixed 0.32 60% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 15.5% Great: 20%
Verbatim STORE N GO 4GB 2,873 User benchmarks, average bench 4% 4GB free, PID 0304 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing as expected (40^th percentile)	2.5% Terrible	Read 7.86 Write 2.06 Mixed 3.12 4% 4.35 MB/s	4K Read 3.77 4K Write 0.007 4K Mixed 0.005 14% 1.26 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.5% Great: 6%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 6GB 111,301 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 0, 0 MHz 2048, 4096 MB Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	24.4% Poor	MC Read 8.7 MC Write 6.7 MC Mixed 5.8 20% 7.07 GB/s	SC Read 8.8 SC Write 9.1 SC Mixed 7.5 24% 8.47 GB/s	Latency 67.3 59% 67.3 ns
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 24.4% Great: 46%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H55A+ Builds (Compare 23 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 56%

Gunboat

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Biostar H55A+

CPU
Core i5-750Intel $72Bench 62%, 43,796 samples	6x
Xeon X3440IntelBench 65%, 6,034 samples	6x
Core i3 540Intel $60Bench 46%, 24,563 samples	4x

GPU
HD Graphics (Clarkdale 0.733/0.9 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 20,588 samples	4x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	4x
GTX 560Nvidia $180Bench 14%, 23,273 samples	2x

SSD
MZ7PD128HCFV-000H1 128GBSamsungBench 83%, 3,024 samples	2x
SSD 128GBPhinocomBench 58%, 33 samples	1x
840 120GBSamsung $109Bench 61%, 51,792 samples	1x

RAM
16GBUnknownBench 41%, 70,565 samples	8x
8GBUnknownBench 34%, 82,857 samples	5x
4GBUnknownBench 26%, 42,830 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 89% - Excellent

Total price: $72

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16