Asus X550JK

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics14.8% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemAsus X550JK  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X550JK
Memory7.5 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190416
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 23 '21 at 18:16
Run Duration107 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4200H
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
60.6% Good
Memory 80.1
1-Core 88.9
2-Core 153
64% 107 Pts
4-Core 242
8-Core 230
32% 236 Pts
64-Core 249
15% 249 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 60.6%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 850M
Asus(1043 178D) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 27.21.14.6647
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
14.8% Very poor
Lighting 19.4
Reflection 22.7
Parallax 16.9
16% 19.7 fps
MRender 11.2
Gravity 20.5
Splatting 14.8
13% 15.5 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 14.8%
Great: 16%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD5000LPLX-00ZNTT0 500GB
142GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 72 75 81 87 82 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
55.6% Above average
Read 115
Write 110
Mixed 64.9
SusWrite 78.9
68% 92 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
157% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 55.6%
Great: 82%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5173DB0-YK0 M471B1G73DM0-YK0 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
43.4% Average
MC Read 15.8
MC Write 16.3
MC Mixed 13.4
43% 15.2 GB/s
SC Read 10.2
SC Write 12.5
SC Mixed 12.1
33% 11.6 GB/s
Latency 80.4
50% 80.4 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 43.4%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X550JK Builds (Compare 564 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Asus X550JK

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 29% - Poor Total price: $36
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback