Asus STRIX Z270F GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 59%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 53%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics60.5% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive160% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus STRIX Z270F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory55.8 GB free of 64 GB @ 3 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170322
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 23 '21 at 04:48
Run Duration233 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 17%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$230
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
86% Excellent
Memory 91.3
1-Core 154
2-Core 294
99% 180 Pts
4-Core 435
8-Core 753
72% 594 Pts
64-Core 756
47% 756 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 86%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 462.59
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
60.5% Good
Lighting 75.9
Reflection 77.9
Parallax 71.4
62% 75.1 fps
MRender 68.4
Gravity 74.9
Splatting 69.2
58% 70.8 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 60.5%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 1TB
182GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 788 863 776 808 718 557 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
160% Outstanding
Read 1,083
Write 853
Mixed 475
SusWrite 752
177% 790 MB/s
4K Read 35.1
4K Write 87.9
4K Mixed 44.3
156% 55.8 MB/s
DQ Read 441
DQ Write 561
DQ Mixed 259
263% 420 MB/s
Poor: 115%
This bench: 160%
Great: 372%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$122
27GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 8,857
Write 8,321
Mixed 8574
1,918% 8,584 MB/s
4K Read 733
4K Write 278
4K Mixed 402
1,772% 471 MB/s
DQ Read 1,628
DQ Write 1,012
DQ Mixed 1,112
884% 1,250 MB/s
Poor: 80% Great: 133%
Samsung 840 Evo 500GB-$150
392GB free
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 374 391 357 394 390 392 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
100% Outstanding
Read 354
Write 371
Mixed 285
SusWrite 383
79% 348 MB/s
4K Read 38.4
4K Write 74.7
4K Mixed 52.1
164% 55.1 MB/s
DQ Read 269
DQ Write 233
DQ Mixed 188
158% 230 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 100%
Great: 126%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$49
201GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 73 76 76 73 72 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
50.3% Above average
Read 101
Write 91.2
Mixed 62.3
SusWrite 73.9
60% 82.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
157% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 50.3%
Great: 76%
Seagate Backup+ Desk 4TB
2TB free
Firmware: 050B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 128 126 131 131 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
73.1% Very good
Read 124
Write 124
Mixed 72.6
SusWrite 131
83% 113 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.6
94% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 73.1%
Great: 91%
Hitachi HDS721010CLA332 1TB
479GB free, PID 2352
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 37 36 37 37 37 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
18.2% Very poor
Read 37.7
Write 39.7
Mixed 34
SusWrite 36.7
51% 37 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
81% 1 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 18.2%
Great: 19%
Hitachi HDS721010CLA332 1TB
835GB free, PID 2352
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.6 4.2 4.8 4.5 4.6 4.6 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
10.6% Very poor
Read 37.8
Write 40.2
Mixed 34.3
SusWrite 4.5
38% 29.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
74% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 10.6%
Great: 19%
WD My Book 1230 4TB
857GB free, PID 1230
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 89 90 89 88 90 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
38.7% Below average
Read 83.2
Write 83.2
Mixed 61.7
SusWrite 88.7
108% 79.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
112% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 38.7%
Great: 60%
WD My Book 1230 4TB
1.5TB free, PID 1230
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 123 122 121 122 123 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
43.7% Average
Read 78.8
Write 80.7
Mixed 63.7
SusWrite 122
120% 86.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
91% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 43.7%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMK32GX4M2D3600C18 CMK32GX4M2B3000C15 CMK32GX4M2D3600C18 CMK32GX4M2B3000C15 64GB
3000, 3000, 3000, 3000 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
95% Outstanding
MC Read 34.3
MC Write 37.7
MC Mixed 29.9
97% 34 GB/s
SC Read 18.2
SC Write 41.1
SC Mixed 28.1
83% 29.1 GB/s
Latency 65.3
61% 65.3 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 95%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical STRIX Z270F GAMING Builds (Compare 6,118 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus STRIX Z270F GAMING - $439

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 96% - Outstanding Total price: $999
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback