ECT One Computer Core i5-4690K, 4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 123%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 109%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 127%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 107%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics113% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive337% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemECT One Computer Core i5-4690K, 4  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK ROG STRIX Z390-E GAMING
Memory28.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 3 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190902
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 22 '21 at 19:21
Run Duration197 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9900KS
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Memory 95
1-Core 159
2-Core 318
104% 191 Pts
4-Core 637
8-Core 1,218
110% 928 Pts
64-Core 1,723
107% 1,723 Pts
Poor: 89%
This bench: 107%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200
Gigabyte(1458 37C6) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2190 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 466.47
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
113% Outstanding
Lighting 143
Reflection 120
Parallax 154
116% 139 fps
MRender 187
Gravity 138
Splatting 110
115% 145 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 113%
Great: 112%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$90
363GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1301 1443 1522 1489 1501 1512 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
337% Outstanding
Read 2,591
Write 2,404
Mixed 1,573
SusWrite 1,462
450% 2,007 MB/s
4K Read 62.5
4K Write 148
4K Mixed 86.5
284% 98.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,372
DQ Write 1,149
DQ Mixed 1,278
953% 1,266 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 337%
Great: 410%
Seagate SkyHawk 4TB (2016)-$95
2TB free
Firmware: CV11
SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 161 163 163 157 162 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
90% Excellent
Read 154
Write 151
Mixed 71.6
SusWrite 160
98% 134 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
157% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 90%
Great: 107%
Toshiba DT01ABA300 3TB
2TB free
Firmware: MZ6OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 25 26 25 25 24 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
37% Below average
Read 104
Write 22.5
Mixed 35.3
SusWrite 25.1
34% 46.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.6
107% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 37%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
95.9% Outstanding
MC Read 36.2
MC Write 37.1
MC Mixed 27.2
96% 33.5 GB/s
SC Read 22.2
SC Write 43.7
SC Mixed 29.3
91% 31.7 GB/s
Latency 57.2
70% 57.2 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 95.9%
Great: 109%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical One Computer Core i5-4690K, 4 Builds (Compare 64 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 136%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 133%
UFO

System: ECT One Computer Core i5-4690K, 4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Good Total price: $2,741
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback