bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (14th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 86 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 18.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory28GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 28GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced. Very high background CPU (90%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardMicrosoft Virtual Machine
Memory9.2 GB free of 28 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181207
Uptime13.6 Days
Run DateMay 22 '21 at 17:03
Run Duration184 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 90%

 PC Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon Platinum 8171M
None, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
18.9% Very poor
Memory 19.5
1-Core 28.8
2-Core 67.2
21% 38.5 Pts
4-Core 112
8-Core 76.5
13% 94.2 Pts
64-Core 67.1
4% 67.1 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 18.9%
Great: 63%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Virtual HD 215GB
200GB free
Firmware: 1.1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 65 68 70 65 68 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
34.3% Below average
Read 348
Write 182
Mixed 239
SusWrite 67.8
46% 209 MB/s
4K Read 13.4
4K Write 15.9
4K Mixed 13.2
46% 14.2 MB/s
DQ Read 62.2
DQ Write 30.8
DQ Mixed 42.3
32% 45.1 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 34.3%
Great: 89%
Virtual HD 429GB
195GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 57 47 49 52 50 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
28.4% Poor
Read 48.7
Write 33.8
Mixed 28.7
SusWrite 50.5
30% 40.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.3
56% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 28.4%
Great: 92%
Microsoft Virtual Disk 161GB
139GB free
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 68 68 70 68 71 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 21% Great: 97%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 28GB
null MHz
1024, 27648 MB
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
21.6% Poor
MC Read 9.7
MC Write 8.3
MC Mixed 6.9
24% 8.3 GB/s
SC Read 4.1
SC Write 4.9
SC Mixed 3.6
12% 4.2 GB/s
Latency 324
12% 324 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 21.6%
Great: 137%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,481 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback